The Everton Board Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Could anyone blame her ? Imagine getting threats and abuse from tens of thousands of people for just doing your job.

All that pent up frustration should be aimed at the real problem (BK).
Would like to see some proof of that please mate. Pretty sure you will struggle to find 10 instances of it, never mind 10s of thousands and if you do find any, it will probably just be keyboard warriors who hadn't had a ham shank for a few days.

The only genuine abuse and threats have came from the board. The mass majority of Everton fans are friendly and peaceful.
 
More defending of DBB after she made a disgusting effort to destabilise this clubs fanbase. Mad how she has support

IMG_2573.webp
IMG_2572.webp
IMG_2571.webp
 

The article is just not worth fretting about at all, it contains a load of nonsense

For starters, it's well documented the league have been supervising our spending for years and we have co-operated. If clubs feel the league should have punished us or stopped us spending, then their legal action would be against the league not us. We've done what we've been allowed to.

Secondly, the basis for the purported legal action is presumably that we should've been docked points or should've had a transfer ban which would've resulted in worse results and us placing lower. The fact is the PL rules around FFP don't prescribe set punishments for any breaches, just a range of measures. Since no punishment is specified how can other clubs claim that we OUGHT to have a certain punishment? Under the rules the PL can do what they like.

Thirdly if the claim is that we shouldn't have been allowed to sign players, how would they prove this harmed them? Anyone who knows anything about football transfers, and Everton transfers in particular, knows they are not guaranteed to make a team better. It would be total conjecture to say what would've happened if we were transfer banned. Maybe in that alternative timeline Tom Cannon has 20 goals for the season and we are comfortably mid table.

Lastly, the article goes on about all the relegated sides suing us for 100m each to compensate which is where they get the 300 MILLION headline, and that's plainly nonsense. The only team that could have any possible action is the one finishing 18th, for reasons that would be obvious to anyone barring, it seems, our friend Matt.
Yep if anything our transfers in have harmed us! They should be bloody grateful!
 
very weak beard too.. shave it off loser
In the days when a seaman in the Royal Navy was allowed to wear a beard, the ruling was that the beard had to cover all of the jawline, only a full set was allowed, beard and mustache, and that there should be no 'show' the gap between the moustache and beard. The reason for this was that a beard looks scruffy and unmanly if you can not grow a strong beard. People with these insipid beards , like our journalistic friend, should really invest ina packet of rasor blades.
 
I'm surprised he hasn't claimed that he was staked out in the parking lot portapotty ( just to ensure the safety of his precious Denise by providing personal surveillance) then he witnessed the heinous and infamous headlock that shook the nation

I think he's knocking her off myself, or in his warped brain he is anyway he's got skin as thick as a Rhino..oops..
 

In the days when a seaman in the Royal Navy was allowed to wear a beard, the ruling was that the beard had to cover all of the jawline, only a full set was allowed, beard and mustache, and that there should be no 'show' the gap between the moustache and beard. The reason for this was that a beard looks scruffy and unmanly if you can not grow a strong beard. People with these insipid beards , like our journalistic friend, should really invest ina packet of rasor blades.
I apply the same set of rules for my missus - no ‘gap’ between the top of the pelvic area and the belly button
 
Could anyone blame her ? Imagine getting threats and abuse from tens of thousands of people for just doing your job.

All that pent up frustration should be aimed at the real problem (BK).
Alleged threats and not one shred of evidence has been offered/produced.

As for doing her job - that's been debatable for a damn sight longer than the board self-imposed exile from games and reports of her not having been into the RLB for weeks... that amounts to abdication of responsibility, and certainly demonstrates a complete lack of self-awareness regarding leadership of a business she's laughably the CEO of.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top