The Everton Board Thread

[Damo_1878]

If there are 100 Everton shares, compared to Moshiri, he has 1. Maybe 2.

The minor independent shareholders and EFCSA members have combined more than 4 times his shares

 

[Damo_1878]

Nah. A line was crossed there.

No. Very good reasons.

The Shareholders Association EFCSA raised the issue

Given "Chairman Bill" is mismanaging their investment. They have a legal right to.

 

[davek]

Bury your head in the sand comes to mind when the board are concerned, Bill especially hasn't had a plan of action since the moment he arrived at the club and Moshri has just let the Zoo run as it has always been which in turn has made things a whole lot worse and now we find ourselves where we are a second straight season of struggle and no hope things will change with the current regime.

The crazy thing to me is that those opposing the board and are setting ultimatums for them to depart are ok with Moshiri staying on.

Thats like getting shut of a box of matches and a can of petrol but inviting the arsonist to stay on as a guest.

 

[davek]

No. Very good reasons.

The Shareholders Association EFCSA raised the issue

Given "Chairman Bill" is mismanaging their investment. They have a legal right to.

Do they have a 'right' to talk about a man's medical history in public?

 

[Lob]

Says it all that: If the board steps down "then we will step down, stop protests and unite and fight to keep us in the league".

Putting the cart before the horse I think that's called.

Also, as much as I dislike Kenwright, openly talking about the feller's health in public (a private matter) is not very clever IMO. They've ballsed that up there.

Agreed. The whole statement is ruined by bringing his health into it. Not only is that personal and private but also inaccurate anyway as the issues with his poor leadership and direction go back a long time before any alleged illness. Really amateur statement by them.

 

[Blue peter]

One such defence yes. His removal would not of been without due cause.

But there won’t be any knowledge of the internal workings of the club which would be key to any tribunal - any protests are understandably driven by the shared dissatisfaction of the club performance and general direction of travel - obviously he would need to prove his claim, just not sure any defence would be assisted by the protests

 

[Damo_1878]

Do they have a 'right' to talk about a man's medical history in public?

Yes. Literally. If he is unfit to chair the company in which they are invested and which is losing money.

 

[davek]

Agreed. The whole statement is ruined by bringing his health into it. Not only is that personal and private but also inaccurate anyway as the issues with his poor leadership and direction go back a long time before any alleged illness. Really amateur statement by them.

I think that whole movement is run by intelligent idiots with zero feel for reading the room.

 

[malfosse]

To be fair to foreverblert92. I think he's only defending DBB because she's helping Everton to win The Championship trophy he so desperately wants.
Board oot.

 

[MikeH72]

She is also someone you wanted "booted oot" only seven months ago.
Wum.
Fixed it @COYBL25

Yes.

 

[davek]

Yes. Literally. If he is unfit to chair the company in which they are invested and which is losing money.

Wait, what?! They have a rule that allows them to flaunt another shareholders personal medical status in public in order to force their removal?

I can just about understand that if he wasn't compos mentis, but I dont think that's the issue here...and neither would it be right to publicize that either.

 

[Damo_1878]

Agreed. The whole statement is ruined by bringing his health into it. Not only is that personal and private but also inaccurate anyway as the issues with his poor leadership and direction go back a long time before any alleged illness. Really amateur statement by them.

It's relevant as he is chair of the board of directors. In a failing business.

 

[Tony’s Carp]

Says it all that: If the board steps down "then we will step down, stop protests and unite and fight to keep us in the league".

Putting the cart before the horse I think that's called.

Also, as much as I dislike Kenwright, openly talking about the feller's health in public (a private matter) is not very clever IMO. They've ballsed that up there.

Yeah I was broadly behind the protests but that’s a terrible statement.

 

[MikeH72]

I see the club plants that just a few months back were trying to throw the fans under the bus over the fake headlock are still active in this thread.

 

[Blue peter]

One thing I do wonder however, is whether (outside of the fan protests, recapitalisation through new investors etc) sacrificing certain members of the board is an act of contrition by the owner to show that we are taking the financial mismanagement of the club more seriously.

Other than we believe we were working with the PL on staying within the P&S financial tolerance, replacing board members would I think prove to be a significant act that the PL would presumably have to take into account when considering severity / proportionality of punishment