Also there back 4 cost less than Micheal Keane, for all this talk they’ve spent a fortuneHard to disagree with that mate, though I'm a big admirer of Gana and Garner.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also there back 4 cost less than Micheal Keane, for all this talk they’ve spent a fortuneHard to disagree with that mate, though I'm a big admirer of Gana and Garner.
Nuno is a very good coach too.
Can whinge and moan about Dyche and his tactics but part of his job is to manage under huge restrictions.
Only team in the league to have made profit from player sales 4 years on the bounce and be bottom of the net spend league.
Not a post to defend Dyche, but more of a perspective in compared to Forest who have spent and have settled.
Also there back 4 cost less than Micheal Keane, for all this talk they’ve spent a fortune
About Dyche, utter rubbish.
"Under huge restrictions".
What would that be?
The only restrictions is the manager himself.
I've heard this nonsense being spouted by one or two Dychettes before about the club's spending in the transfer market.
At the end of the day that team on the pitch can play a lot better and win a lot more. It is Dyche that is holding them back. It is precisely that.
Anything else is just semantics.
Erm...inheriting a relegation threatened side, selling anything that's not nailed down, 8 points deductions, klarna pay transfer deals, having to make profits each transfer window for PSR?
Other than that, it's black and white innit.
Spending like Chelsea’s is something no one said.They spent a lot when they first came up, most teams do as they have championship squads, especially if you’ve been out the prem like 20yrs. Last 2 summer they’ve spent like 200 and brought in 150. Let’s not try and make out Forest have spent like Chelsea and Utd
It’s got to do with the fact our defence and keeper have cost, over 100mil,Well, seeing as Dyche has only been allowed to spend actual money on 5 players, he'd have done well to buy a whole new back 4, so not sure what that's got to with anything. You've also got to factor in wages and signing on fees, and the fact they seemingly purposefully broke PSR rules during the period they've built this squad, something nobody could level at Dyche, he walked in to the issues. They've well outspent us in recent seasons.
It’s got to do with the fact our defence and keeper have cost, over 100mil,
Just because dyche didn’t buy the majority of them doesn’t change the fact he inherited a expensive set of players.
Forest also started from a lower base, of basically championship players,
Their two CB’s cost 12mil each,
O’Brien cost 17. I’d also bet our wage bill is still higher
Before the season started there were shouts for McKenna at Ipswich but theyve died down. As I said a couple of weeks ago -- with him needing to rebuild much of the team with young players is this someone who may be suitable for our role?
Anyone still interested in him? Currently winning 2-0 vs Spurs.
I think he seems well suited to what we need.
Well dyche thinks he is as he plays him most weeks. But Pickford cost 25 and is worth more, Branthwaite and DCl cost 1 mil give or take, it’s swings and roundabouts with signings.Okay then mate, so what we're saying is that Michael Keane is actually a £27 million player? Actually, scratch that, let's adjust it for inflation; he's defo a 40 million pound player, I agree.
Well dyche thinks he is as he plays him most weeks.
Apparently against us they had 6 players v that had played for Ipswich in league oneBefore the season started there were shouts for McKenna at Ipswich but theyve died down. As I said a couple of weeks ago -- with him needing to rebuild much of the team with young players is this someone who may be suitable for our role?
Anyone still interested in him? Currently winning 2-0 vs Spurs.
I think he seems well suited to what we need.