So let me get this right.....
The fact that they've previously borrowed against future revenue - which is something that those eager to have a pop have criticised the club for. Is now being used to take another side swipe as they're not seemingly doing the same with the incremental £25m that will be earned this season?
You can't have both sides of that argument, you're either against borrowing against future revenues & therefore should see the failure to do so with the incremental revenue as a positive, or you want them to do just that, in which case you can't take a swipe at the funding costs, which are merely what we can obtain in the market.