Would Walcott get into the following starting 11- Liverpool, Man U, Man City, Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea? I would think the answer is no. We want to compete or be better than these teams. So why would we want to buy a player who isn't good enough for these teams, is injury prone, will cost us $20 million and is getting on on age?
If we buy him and fill the rest of the team with players who don't get in the top 6 sides-like Rooney, Sig, Our new striker etc etc don't expect us to compete with these teams. What you will get is what happen against Spurs at the weekend. It's not rocket science. They had a better team and a better manager. Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not slagging off the likes of Rooney and the others. I think Rooney was an excellent football player with a rare gift. Man U paid for that gift for many good years. Then when he started to slow down and decrease in effectiveness (which happens to everyone so it isn't a slant at Rooney) they sold him back to us. Gave us a bucket load of cash and took our best player. We then squandered the money thanks to Koeman. Can you see the pattern? We can buy Lukaku back in 10 years so don't worry. He will only cost us a billion dollars by then!!!!
The only way to break the cycle is to stop selling the top players and spend big on brining in more top players. Couple this with a top manager. Some may say we can't attract these types of players but I disagree. We can!
I'm glad this one looks close. Very good signing and helps address am obvious flaw, that being pace.
Would Walcott get into the following starting 11- Liverpool, Man U, Man City, Spurs, Arsenal, Chelsea? I would think the answer is no. We want to compete or be better than these teams. So why would we want to buy a player who isn't good enough for these teams, is injury prone, will cost us $20 million and is getting on on age?
If we buy him and fill the rest of the team with players who don't get in the top 6 sides-like Rooney, Sig, Our new striker etc etc don't expect us to compete with these teams. What you will get is what happen against Spurs at the weekend. It's not rocket science. They had a better team and a better manager. Please don't misunderstand me. I'm not slagging off the likes of Rooney and the others. I think Rooney was an excellent football player with a rare gift. Man U paid for that gift for many good years. Then when he started to slow down and decrease in effectiveness (which happens to everyone so it isn't a slant at Rooney) they sold him back to us. Gave us a bucket load of cash and took our best player. We then squandered the money thanks to Koeman. Can you see the pattern? We can buy Lukaku back in 10 years so don't worry. He will only cost us a billion dollars by then!!!!
The only way to break the cycle is to stop selling the top players and spend big on brining in more top players. Couple this with a top manager. Some may say we can't attract these types of players but I disagree. We can!
Without wishing to defend the recruitment people as they've bought some dross, I believe the plan is to buy young players and develop them over a couple of years, so the buying of old expensive players can then stop. Clubs at our level can only buy players at the beginning or end of their careers. If they are top level and at peak age they will go to a bigger clubI just don’t get get the current business strategy of signing hugely expensive players on big contracts for players in their late 20’s.
That’s unsustainable in the long term. The recruitment strategy the last couple of years is beyond poor.
Scored over 100 goals for Arsenal in about 420 gamesMate he hasn't scored 65 goals for arsenal in 11 years. For a team that finishes top 4 it's not a good return