Kever10
Player Valuation: £20m
This is his 4th transfer window isnt it? to not have brought in a left back by now is near on embarrassing.
I dont, but if you look at the traditional roles and responsibilities of a Director of Football - you'll see he is failing. Nothing to do with tactics or team, thats nothing to do with director of football so dont know why thats being suggested.
Yeah it probably is positive, but the fact we went after multiple managers which dont follow the same philosophy suggests that the traditional DoF role of ensure the club endures regardless of a manager isnt being implemented.
So, in your mind (opinion) his role is head of recruitment........ sound I agree with that, because what he is doing is nothing like a DoF works like.
So you claim that I suggested about signing world class players, and complaining about their fee's when I said nothing of the sort. That is odd.
anyway, arsed carrying this on, you suggested he is head of recruitment, I probably agree with that so the club needs to assess how it gives out job titles.
My initial point was not made in response to you, but the general negativity towards him, which includes but is not restricted to, the type and quality of player we have signed. Your response to me, was to argue that he has failed without equally being able to tell me what his role is or should be and what he has specifically failed in.
As for left back, identifying, scouting, tracking, bidding, buying are all different things. Like I say, you have no reason, other than the fact we have yet to sign a top left back, that we have not done any of the aforementioned levels, and again, there still needs to be an agreement between him and the management team, as well as the negotiations with the other team. You could also suggest that that Lewis Gibson, who we spent £6m on in August is an example of the forward thinking for a player in that position, but whatever, I'm not precious.
I at no point said he was only a director of recruitment, although I assume he would have that as 1 of his many roles he has to balance.
My initial point, was and continues to be, that he appears to be something of an intermediary scape goat for our team under performing, and I feel, especially given I don't know the ins and outs of his performance agreement, that it's a bit harsh, and that the majority of our current woes land squarely at the feet of a manager who we foolishly believed knew what he was doing, and he was tracked and appointed before Walsh was, so it all seems a bit reactionary.
His role going forward is not something that will be fixed overnight and the fact we are now faced with sorting a mess out mid season as we are, his influence is only going to be marginalised again, while we fight for survival.