orly
Please check with me for Blammo criteria
I had considered who he was playing for Orly. Even in that 7 year period for Arsenal he would have finished top scorer once, second highest twice and third highest on another occasion. The other years he only played a handful of games due to injury but still managed to finish 5th highest scorer at worst.
My point, and I probably didn't make it very clearly, is that he isn't and has never been (apart from a very occasional match) their primary focus of attack, and won't be with us either. He's either played as a winger or wide in a 433, and his goal/assist record, even in an attacking free flowing side like Arsenal, is none too shabby for somebody playing in that position. He's been in competition with players like Sanchez, Giroud, Wellbeck, Ozil, Cazorla, Ramsey, Nasri, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Wilshire and Van Persie during that period, so game time has been hard to come by.
I'm assuming that you are against the signing mate. I can understand why and have many concerns myself. But, if I'm honest, I've seen us buy a lot worse over the last 3/4 years. Compare it to Oxlade-Chamberlain who the RS paid well over £30m for. He has 9 premier goals compared to Walcott's 65.
No not against the Walcott signing at all. I think it is a bit of shame that we are going after players like him, but that's where we are currently. I don't see how we get a similar league-ready player for anything like that kind of money in January. Plus if you are buying Walcott 6 months before the WC is easily the best time to sign him.
I just think he isn't that good a player, and his goal scoring record is pretty poor for someone to have played at Arsenal for the last ten years.