Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can Anyone post the article?
They will end up suing each other. As either way, one of them has to go down. They can't deduct points after the matter. They would deduct for next season.I wonder if the team that doesn't get relegated will still consider being litigious? just seems vindictive
Because we do what we want.How does the club explain £170m loss over 2 seasons because of Covid when Villa and Newcastle is around £40m each?
New Stadium?.How does the club explain £170m loss over 2 seasons because of Covid when Villa and Newcastle is around £40m each?
Burnley fan in work has ties to the club. If they go down they have £65m to pay and quick. Parachute covers 30m of that. Player sales the rest it seems.
They'll be fine, becuase they aren't giving pensioners 300k a week, but even so. Daunting.
Our reasoning was that we had lost huge amounts in transfer revenue due to the market collapsing due to covid.How does the club explain £170m loss over 2 seasons because of Covid when Villa and Newcastle is around £40m each?
Reality?Our reasoning was that we had lost huge amounts in transfer revenue due to the market collapsing due to covid.
That's not covidNew Stadium?.
Yes.Reality?
Everton believe they have comfortable headroom regarding the Premier League's profit and sustainability regulations after the club published their latest set of accounts on Tuesday. The Blues recorded a loss of £120.9m for the year ending 30th June 2021.
However, despite another year with a daunting figure in terms of headline losses, Everton have been in constant and pro-active discussions with the Premier League for a significant amount of time over their finances. The club, therefore, are very confident that they not only fall below the £105m threshold over the last three seasons, but that they have significant headroom - although an official figure would not be confirmed in this sense.
The Premier League offer numerous "add-backs" as part of their regulations, including measures taking into account the impact of Covid-19 over the course of the last few years. Losses of at least £170m, potentially rising to £220m, can be attributed to the pandemic in Everton's case over the course of the last two years - with £103m of that in the financial year ending in 2021.
Other add-backs centre around the building of a new stadium, investment in the academy structure at the club and money spent on improving the Women's team. In all, it can be deduced that Everton are claiming a large sum in add-backs, which is likely to push them under the threshold for the Premier League's regulations.
The club's numbers have been audited and checked over on multiple occasions over the course of recent months and years, with constant talks taking place with league officials in that time. It's understood that the Premier League are happy with the numbers being submitted.
Reports earlier in the year suggested that Everton could even face a points deduction as it was speculated they would be in breach of the profit and sustainability rules. However, that assumption can now be confirmed as being wide of the mark.
The club won't release a specific figure over how much they lie below the threshold set by the Premier League. This is due to them being in a competitive market, and not being required to publicly share that level of information.
But there is a confidence behind the scenes that the Blues are in a comfortable state in terms of financial fair play despite what, on the face of things at least, looked like another series of heavy losses. This was the situation as it stood at the end of June 2021, and so has not taken into account the effects of last summer's transfer window and the recent effects of the January transfer window in 2022 either.
Because of that, it's likely that the club's situation has changed again. Although senior figures at Goodison Park remain confident that they are in a strong position.
It is also believed that profit and sustainability compliance will not be a significant factor in terms of the club potentially selling players in the future. That will remain a footballing decision to be led by manager Frank Lampard and director of football Kevin Thelwell as they see fit, with any money gained being reinvested in the squad accordingly.
I know, but we were still actively spending on it and if I recall capital spending can be off set against operating losses.That's not covid