catcherintherye
Player Valuation: £80m
I'd argue that the expectation was the initial games would be the hardest to push. It's a hugely unpopular concept given that people had got use to all games on their existing platforms at no extra cost. That's a very hard sell in the short term.
There was, and is still, a sense of people making a stand and saying no but like other things that will to make a stand weakens and what was previously vehement and vocal opposition becomes indifference to the product and then becomes begrudgingly accepted (Where else are you going to get it?) and then becomes the new normal way to consume the product.
The time that the PL will be privately looking and thinking things aren't working is a year or two down the line - as of now it's just riding out the bad publicity and may well make the odd sympathetic noise or token symbol of repentance as a PR ploy.
It wouldn't surprise me if it was deliberately overpriced so as to present a price correction as a climbdown. If people think buying a game for £10 instead of £15 is a win then let them win. Like boxing the price will creep up eventually.
PL gets the price they wanted and Twitter fans everywhere celebrate the pyrrhic victory of a price cut while ultimately still buying the new product. PL going the Black Friday route.
All of that makes a lot of sense. I am not sure it would be the hardest though. Had it been announced properly, with a good build up, and the correct games targetted it would have been targetted etc. It could have been really successful.
I think all of this has done, is united people not only againt 15 pounds a game, but against the notion of PPV full stop. If it goes away, as it will likely do, fans will now be emboldened that if people don't buy it, quite quickly they have to shelve the plans. This will have a lot of sentiment now and be a very broad message if they ever try it again.
Likewise providers will look at football, look at the concrete numbers, and be very edgy. There's a lot of guff around football, but decision makers tend to look at figures. The figures are pitiful, the opposition enormous and understandably broadcasters will just look at it and say it doesn't look viable.
As for thr reductions, well Mike Ashley suggested a reduction to a fiver. Most of the comments were slaughtering him saying it shouldn't be any extra money. I think that window has passed and people are now very angry with what has happened.
I have no doubt what the thinking of the PL was, but it's just another example of them being horribly out of touch with their customers. Honestly 40000 people watching, for teams who will get over 100k paying to watch at a stadium is an appalling return. You could throw on bob sleighing on ITV 4 and I'd imagine it gets better viewership than 40,000!