Let me say for the fifth or sixth time that I'm not saying Browning is a bad player. I'm saying we can't afford to have that kind of performance from our right back if we want to consistently win matches. Browning looked like a central defender at right back, which is no shade on him, because that's what he is. I don't even see any reason to think he couldn't develop into a decent right back at some point -- it took a few matches before it seemed to click for Galloway, but now he's doing really well and Browning seems like a similar kind of player. But looking purely at yesterday's match, I think right back was the single biggest reason that we drew the match instead of winning. Is that really that controversial?