That's true.Seems pointless to play 2 fellas out of position when you can just have one out of position
Begovic at left back it is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's true.Seems pointless to play 2 fellas out of position when you can just have one out of position
With shouts of Onana were only a couple days away from someone genuinely saying start Pickford there cos he's a leftyThat's true.
Begovic at left back it is.
Unavailable for Wolves
Press confSource ?
Press conf
BuggeredUnavailable for Wolves
That is very bad news and not to say Mykolenko is That Good but losing him is a big issue for us as we dont have a like for like replacement. Please can we be spared Dyche shoehorning a centre back in there thinking its a game of Looky Likey - they do not Looky Likey left backs!Unavailable for Wolves
Just take the gamble, use McNeil and bring gray in on the left.
McNeil does most the work on the left anyway, so with gray on aswell you've also added another goal threat.
It's not really an additional goal threat though is it? Because it moves probably our biggest goal threat away from where he's been effective. Not saying it's a terrible idea, but it's easy to see it as a negative move as much as a positive one really.Just take the gamble, use McNeil and bring gray in on the left.
McNeil does most the work on the left anyway, so with gray on aswell you've also added another goal threat.
I dont think the issue is 'can McNeil cover for Mykolenko?' as much as it is 'Can Gray cover for McNeil?'Just take the gamble, use McNeil and bring gray in on the left.
McNeil does most the work on the left anyway, so with gray on aswell you've also added another goal threat.