Even if it is a Miyota movement there's nowt wrong with that...I found out while digging last night that they also came up with the UHF caliber that's in the Bulova Precisionist line which I think are pretty sweet as they're a three-prong quartz movement but at 262 kHz so the seconds hand sweeps almost as smooth as a Seiko spring drive. Their 9015 hi-beat caliber has a fantastic rep too...but yeah, who knows. Only thing that matters is that you like it, I was just curious as Citizen isn't deep into the mech movement area in general so maybe they're going all-in now, which would be good. With all the crap that went on with ETA (aka Swatch Group) movements, it'd be good to have another possible supplier to micro brands if ETA start threatening people again.
Some Miyota movements are pretty poor, such as their 8215, which has large QC problems. But others are decent. My sense is Citizen is making a big play into the mechanical movements, having bought Frederique Constant and Bulova and La Joux-Perret (which makes seriously nice high-end movements).
Good quick overview by Forbes here.
As to the ETA fiasco, it seems a lot of the smaller brands are moving to Sellita, which is just fine as they used to make the parts for ETA anyhoo.
edit: I should add, even after 20+ years of watch-insanity, I'm still not sure where I fall out on the "in-house" versus ETA vs Sellita vs other movement "issue." I sometimes buy a watch for the movement (e.g Tudor, North Flag) and sometimes buy watches purely for the aesthetic, such at the PAM 283, which has a stripped down 7750 movement in it, and works just fine for me. When push comes to shove, I mostly pick a watch on design, heritage, reputation, and not necessarily the movement inside (as quite a few watches in produced by luxury brands in the 2000s had ETAs of some form).
Last edited: