Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neither of whom could tie his bootlacesWe’ve just spent £50m on two attacking players.
Please don’t compare Rooney to Lukaku.You could say the same about most strikers. Lukaku cost nearly 100m and yet I have never seen a striker more goals when a game is already won than him.
We would still have finished seventh last season without any goal from Lukaku which is amazing.
I don't think we would be where we are without the Rooney goals.
They’ve hardly played to know this. Rooney isn’t he answer. Should be shipped off to China.
lolNeither of whom could tie his bootlaces
Not a lie, though, is it?Sigurdsson has played more than him
Oh I forgot... he's played out of position. That old chestnut
Please don’t compare Rooney to Lukaku.
Rooney doesn’t belong in the Premier League and it is to our detriment that we’re stuck with him for another year.
And still better than Walcott and Tosun, so your point is?lol
He can just about tie his own bootlaces at this stage. More interested in getting pissed and smoking.
Not a lie, though, is it?
Agreed he is a fat waste, he sort of swans round the pitch now in a has-been cavalier sort of way now and we have to carry him by putting players with energy around him. And I wouldn't actually mind sacrificing Rooney to go two up top like you say. I said I'd like us to go two up top in another thread.Gueye
Bolasie Sigurdsson Lookman
Tuson Walcott
No need for that fat waste.
At this point, since he has 10 goals, if BFS is serious about not playing both Rooney and Siggurdson at the same time, Rooney has to be starting unless he gets spelled for fatigue.
Sure.You're right mate. He was twice the player rom will ever be.
That’s your opinion. My opinion is he is a fat drunk who shouldn’t be near the squad.And still better than Walcott and Tosun, so your point is?