Unfortunately, it's none of our business. They're not obliged to share anything with supporters.They claim to have a long term strategy ready to put in place for the club. Think we need to see all the groups plans tbh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately, it's none of our business. They're not obliged to share anything with supporters.They claim to have a long term strategy ready to put in place for the club. Think we need to see all the groups plans tbh
Why would anyone say an all equity bid is impossible? Whether or not that is viable is purely about the financial situation of the buyer and has nothing to do with the
Target. An all equity bid is also no guarantee that the owners don't intend to saddle the club with debt two months later. That happens all the time on leveraged buy outs. It just means the buyers have sufficient cash to finance the acquisition in short term. Almost all investors will load on debt because it is much cheaper than equity and magnifies their returns on investment.
Whatever the worst option is, is the one that will take us over.
I'm confused sorry mate, so will just interrupt here.
Clearly someone isn't going to buy the club, without a plan for the debt. They'll need to demonstrate that to become owners, anyway.
Let's keep it as simple as we can.
Manoukian's bid is an all equity one.
The others' bid will borrow and put that extra debt on the club/the stadium.
I'm sure all will restructure debt, but if you're talking worry - Manookian not making that debt even bigger should ease it considerably.
Exactly.
Only Bell and Downing have briefed what the plan is.
The rest of the bidders seem to be getting out through leaks (probably at Everton) to firm up interest from others.
Everyone will have some kind of a plan for the debt. Bell and Downing conform they will INCREASE the overall debt, but they have a long term strategic lender.
Honestly, I'm happy with Bell/Downing, MSP or Manouklan and his sickness techbros.
All three are clearly smart operators. Hopefully we'll get some clarity in the week ahead.
The Dell blag really doesn't sit well with me.
I reckon that was an intentional bum steer and I've had enough of owners blagging fans over the years.
If they have a debt package as well as part of the plan - unless the 400 mill is going to pay down the debt - then that is taking out debt as well, if that's being restructured
If they do that, then that is a debt and equity bid.
Bell and Downing is a debt and equity bid as well.
We dont know the specifics of refinancing/restructuring yet, whether any of the above will borrow - what we already owe, at a fixed interest over a longer period time and have one lender as opposed to MSP, R&M and 777 or borrow additional money in a restructure to top that out. I.E - it might not be additional debt by either party - just a better loan agreement on what we owe.
If Manoukian is paying down some of the debt without the need to restructure, brilliant, but that's not clear.
I am less inclined to lean towards Bell and Downing due to the people backing them.
They would be my least favourite option.
The only positive I'd give them is they'd probably do a fair bit more for the surrounding area and resurrect the Goidison Legacy in some shape or form.If it was them who briefed/the headlines around it which had fans thinking Dell were buying/sponsoring etc, then I'd be disappointed for this reason;
The Dell blag really doesn't sit well with me.
I reckon that was an intentional bum steer and I've had enough of owners blagging fans over the years.
Textor or Friedkin would be my preference at the moment. Even Friedkin at 45% to put the money in we need.
Whatever the worst option is, is the one that will take us over.