Think he was a genuine fan,just a crap businessman.
I dont believe a genuine fan would conduct half the activities he did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Think he was a genuine fan,just a crap businessman.
I would have to lean towards Manky currently. Although something smells about the whole thing.Who is your favoured option at the moment?
I'd imagine all the forum members here are committed Blues,but look at the divergence of opinions on how the club should be run. Being stupid doesn't negate your support for Everton.I dont believe a genuine fan would conduct half the activities he did.
Hi mate, I’m an M&A finance partner at a US law firm. I do actually know what I’m talking about although I obviously don’t know the specifics of these deal. Why would any bidder borrower money to buy an asset and then repay it on day 1? That would never happen because lenders always charge an arrangement fee of 2-3% of the amount borrowed which a borrower would never ever want to pay for debt borrower for such a short period, every debt package includes a non-call period, I.e. if you repay in the first or second year there will be a big repayment penalty. Also, just generally debt is much cheaper than equity so unless the investor has no interest in his return on investment they will all look to put a debt package in place eventually. An all equity bid only benefits Moshiri. Not Everton.Exactly.
In my opinion, too many commentators say with certainty what will happen without factoring that in.
We had blogs etc from people saying there wouldn't be any interest at all in Everton because this, this and this.
Now look.
Likewise, someone who buys with borrowing could technically pay it off day one.
But there's no doubt on the surface, an all equity bid is preferable.
I'd imagine all the forum members here are committed Blues,but look at the divergence of opinions on how the club should be run. Being stupid doesn't negate your support for Everton.
A good each way bet that mate - it's the Everton wayWhatever the worst option is, is the one that will take us over.
I wouldn't be so sure.I have my own thoughts on the murky seedy West London world BK operated in and his cronies.
We may disagree on football matters but I'd argue 99 percent of the forum wouldn't take out loans for the club from a mate.
Hi mate, I’m an M&A finance partner at a US law firm. I do actually know what I’m talking about although I obviously don’t know the specifics of these deal. Why would any bidder borrower money to buy an asset and then repay it on day 1? That would never happen because lenders always charge an arrangement fee of 2-3% of the amount borrowed which a borrower would never ever want to pay for debt borrower for such a short period, every debt package includes a non-call period, I.e. if you repay in the first or second year there will be a big repayment penalty. Also, just generally debt is much cheaper than equity so unless the investor has no interest in his return on investment they will all look to put a debt package in place eventually. An all equity bid only benefits Moshiri. Not Everton.
An all equity bid is also no guarantee that the owners don't intend to saddle the club with debt two months later.
Not even the papers mate it was that Kaveh on Sky who said it.Bell and Downing have never said Dell is buying into the club.
Its always been them two with backing from the Dell MSD arrangement.
The papers sensationalise for a reason.
This, unfortunately is exactly what will happen. The only reason Moshiri persisted with 777 so long is that they were offering him the best deal for him. Mosh will sort himself out as best he can.Moshiri will sell to whoever gives him personally the best deal unfortunately, irrelevant who we want/think is best.
I'm heavily skeptical as a default stance, but I don't think it was. To me it looked like it evolved from people/journalists doing a bit of digging, and then a lot of 1+1= 98 billion.
The original reports just said "backed by MSD" and then as time went on it progressed from MSD being identified as the Dell Family Office to "we're getting bought by Michael Dell" to "we're gonna have Dell on our shirts"
Could be wrong, obviously, but i really didn't get the impression of intentional misdirection.
Which is not to say they're my preferred option - we don't know enough (and most likely never will) to make that judgement. Which is why i haven't voted in the poll
WellWhat certainty and clarity have they give? Other than name the lender and like tweets?
We shouldn't expect certainty/clarity at this stage anyway - we'll only get a general idea.