[Poor language removed] me reading back through all this anyone would think that we lost 5-0 and were in the relegation zone. This place is losing its shine and its down to 1 or 2 key posters. You know who you are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How was Valente even bad?
He had Valencia well sorted most of the game. None of the back line was poor. How was Valente the worst? Carlsey, Neville and Cahill were absolutely atrocious and gave us zero in midfield. Valente was fine.
[Poor language removed] me reading back through all this anyone would think that we lost 5-0 and were in the relegation zone. This place is losing its shine and its down to 1 or 2 key posters. You know who you are.
Yeah, I felt Valente played well. He's actually better with Pienaar because he can link up well. Not keen on Ossie out wide, but needs must.
Naturally.
Personally I would've had;
Hibbert - Jagielka - Lescott - Valente
Neville - Carsley - Osman - Arteta
For me, Neville has always played quite well when played wide right. Against United away for example, and other games, much better offering cover for Hibbert and providing good crosses from deep than trying to be a creative midfielder in the centre. It also put Osman in a position that it is clear he does not flourish when playing in.
Still, we won, and it is important that noone is under the illusion that performance is in any way on par with it. 3 pts was vital, and we secured them. For all their fancy football, even playing against 10 men, City could only draw 1-1 at the JJB. I know which I'd prefer.
MOTM: AJ. Superb workrate and excellent finish.
Agree on 2 points: Neville always looks best wide right, and Aj was outstanding today.
Underperformer of the day: tie between Neville and Cahill, hopefully Timmy was keeping his powder dry for Wednesday.
I think Fernandes is the long term replacement for Carsley. Remember early in his career he was likened to Makalele. I think we have this image of him here as an attacking player because he has so much skill and I suppose in a way this is a testemony to the fact that we've had Carsley and Neville in that role in the past,
Why cos i challenge your posts and don,t roll over to your greatness.Ok, sorry but don't really want to speak to you anymore.
The problem is ghost you come on in a bad mood post some aggressive posts without thinking half the time then when someone questions you,you get more aggressive,then if they come back at you again you play the sympathy card or threaten to quit the forum.There is more to it then what we read Mick. Its got out of hand. But explaining yourself online is becoming a right pain in the arse. Maybe we should all video conference and then we can get the points across quicker.
Also mate, are you referring to me? Because maybe you should not skirt around the issue and just say what's on your mind.