TheFinnFan
Finners
Walkers price tag is so big because one particular reason...teams that are doing business are top clubs and rivals. Personally I think it was steep price and good for both teams
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Deckard2049
Player Valuation: £15m
Substitute just as good with better and I agree with you. I am contradicting myself over this potential signing, as I usually wouldn't advocate comparing our signings with any other team. Would he improve our team? Yes. And for some I know that's all that matters. But this attitude that 50 million is nothing and that the player is totally worth it is nonsense. This is why we're all on a forum and people with actual negotiating abilities do these deals.
mkrudden
Player Valuation: £40m
But the top 6 all have a player or two in that playmaking role already.
Coutinho
Ozil
Eriksen
Hazard
Mkhi
Mata
Silva
De Bruyne.
If they didn't, they'd be after Sigurdsson, I'm sure of it, simply because these players are an endangered species.
Hes not worth 50m, but if thats how much he costs, then I think we should pay it, not cos I think hes some super duper superstar, mainly cos our manager really wants him and if Ross leaves, we dont have have anybody else like him.
Sure we could take a gamble on a player from overseas, like City have just done with Silva, but its a risk, some players simply dont adapt to the league, with Iceland we know he can cope with the demands of the league and perform in it.
Get it done I say, despite the cost.
I dont think we have a bottomless pit, but I think we have promised our manager certain targets will be met, Iceland seems 1 of them.
Deckard2049
Player Valuation: £15m
I have no problem backing the manager. And if the player signed everyone would back him. But he is not a fifty million player whether Koeman wants him or not. We are stacked in midfield. I know you can't have enough good players, but I would be more much comfortable paying this money if we'd already purchased another new CB and a proper Lukaku replacement.
Thing is though mate, no player is worth 50 mil IMO. But they are worth whatever club x is willing to sell them for and what club y is willing to pay.
I gave up caring about the digits in football a while ago, because it seems they mean absolutely nothing these days with the amount of money getting pumped into the game.
KevMirallas
Player Valuation: £35m
Given the whole "desperate to get him in before Holland" thing, I'm kinda surprised how quiet it's all gone.
Again though, this comes down to backing the manager.
He may have decided already that he was going to go with Williams, Keane, Mori and Holgate as CB options for the first part of the season, however the injury to Mori may mean he brings another in now.
I wouldn't be surprised to see another brought in, would you?
As for a striker, we know another will come in, we have been told that. It's only the middle of July, we are by far the most active team in the market thus far, is this not a case of you being impatient and demanding signings in the positions YOU think need strengthening now and not going with the managers judgement?
Haven't read the article yet but it's Sigurdsson related: http://www.skysports.com/football/n...to-everton-is-the-swansea-man-value-for-money
Swansea's Gylfi Sigurdsson has been linked with a £50m move to Everton. The Iceland international boasts some impressive statistics, but could they be misleading? Adam Bate delves deeper into the data to find out.
There is no doubt that Gylfi Sigurdsson played a key role in Swansea's survival. With nine goals and 13 assists, he was directly involved in more of the Swans' strikes than any other player, scoring winners against Liverpool and Southampton and a late equaliser at Old Trafford. He was duly named player of the season by both supporters and team-mates.
So perhaps it should be no surprise that Everton are interested in taking Sigurdsson to Goodison Park. They will be further encouraged by the fact that the 28-year-old attacking midfielder covered more ground than any other Premier League player last season. He ranked third in the country for assists and was seventh for total chances created.
But curiously, there are doubts about the robustness and repeatability of what Sigurdsson achieved at Swansea. In particular, a deeper look at those assists raises issues. According to Opta, although Sigurdsson registered 13 of them, the number of goals that Swansea might have expected to score from the opportunities he fashioned last season was only 6.85.
What are expected assists?
Opta says: “The Expected Assist Model measure the likelihood that a pass will be a goal assist based on where the pass was received, what type of pass it was and a variety of other factors.”
Sigurdsson's expected assists were nowhere near his actual tally
The reason for this is that the quality of chance being created by Sigurdsson was not particularly high. This is largely because an extraordinarily high number of them came from set-pieces rather than open play. Fifty-two of the chances Sigurdsson created were from dead-ball situations - nobody else in the Premier League could come up with more than 40.
In fact, Sigurdsson was credited with 38 chances created from corner kicks alone. There are a number of reasons why this could be problematic. While Sigurdsson's delivery is undoubtedly impressive, these are generally considered difficult opportunities to convert - often headers that are being won under pressure amidst a crowd of bodies.
Sigurdsson created more chances from set plays than anyone else
That the number is so high surely owes much to the abilities of his targets in the penalty box. Eleven of those chances created from corners found their way to 6'4" striker Fernando Llorente, renowned for his heading ability. A further 13 were to Alfie Mawson, a young defender who scored seven goals in a season at both Barnsley and Wycombe Wanderers.
Next on the list? That's Mawson's fellow defender Federico Fernandez. Indeed, defenders were the recipients of the majority of these chances - a reflection of the fact that more than two thirds of all chances created by Sigurdsson were headers. Fernandez got on the end of five corners without finding the net. In fact, only one of them was even on target.
Sigurdsson enjoyed arguably the best season of his career in 2016/17
Just because Llorente, Mawson and Fernandez are capable of diverting an outswinging corner in the general direction of the goal - and 28 of these 38 chances were from right-wing corners - does not necessarily mean the numbers are transferable to another club. Tellingly, only three of these corners actually resulted directly in Swansea goals.
Of course, expertise from set plays is not a negative. The fact that Swansea ranked in the top three in the Premier League for both headed and set-piece goals was a huge factor in their survival. Everton would surely look to put Sigurdsson on corners and free-kicks in the expectation that he can help to boost their own numbers in this regard.
Moreover, the fact that this skill is such a big part of Sigurdsson's game adds context to the question marks over his age relative to his price. While he could be on the cusp of a downturn in output at 28, his set-piece delivery is unlikely to suffer into this thirties. That will bring confidence that he will be a useful asset for the full length of his next contract.
Swansea boss Paul Clement admits Sigurdsson could leave
However, it is vital that Everton appreciate what they would be getting for their £50m investment. While the headline numbers put Sigurdsson in the top bracket of Premier League creators alongside Kevin De Bruyne, Christian Eriksen, Mesut Ozil and David Silva, the type and quality of the chances they supply for team-mates are actually very different.
To illustrate the point further, there are 71 players who created more open-play chances than Sigurdsson in the Premier League last season. That included Kevin Mirallas and three other Everton players. Ross Barkley created 54 such chances. Sigurdsson managed only 25 - the same number that Gareth Barry and Idrissa Gueye produced in fewer games.
Even from set plays, it is uncertain how much of an impact that Sigurdsson might have at Everton given that Barkley, Mirallas and Baines shared the team's set-piece duties last term, creating 51 opportunities in the process - only one fewer than Sigurdsson. A quality player then, but one whose £50m signature comes with considerable caveats. Buyer beware.
Swansea's Gylfi Sigurdsson has been linked with a £50m move to Everton. The Iceland international boasts some impressive statistics, but could they be misleading? Adam Bate delves deeper into the data to find out.
There is no doubt that Gylfi Sigurdsson played a key role in Swansea's survival. With nine goals and 13 assists, he was directly involved in more of the Swans' strikes than any other player, scoring winners against Liverpool and Southampton and a late equaliser at Old Trafford. He was duly named player of the season by both supporters and team-mates.
So perhaps it should be no surprise that Everton are interested in taking Sigurdsson to Goodison Park. They will be further encouraged by the fact that the 28-year-old attacking midfielder covered more ground than any other Premier League player last season. He ranked third in the country for assists and was seventh for total chances created.
But curiously, there are doubts about the robustness and repeatability of what Sigurdsson achieved at Swansea. In particular, a deeper look at those assists raises issues. According to Opta, although Sigurdsson registered 13 of them, the number of goals that Swansea might have expected to score from the opportunities he fashioned last season was only 6.85.
What are expected assists?
Opta says: “The Expected Assist Model measure the likelihood that a pass will be a goal assist based on where the pass was received, what type of pass it was and a variety of other factors.”
Sigurdsson's expected assists were nowhere near his actual tally
The reason for this is that the quality of chance being created by Sigurdsson was not particularly high. This is largely because an extraordinarily high number of them came from set-pieces rather than open play. Fifty-two of the chances Sigurdsson created were from dead-ball situations - nobody else in the Premier League could come up with more than 40.
In fact, Sigurdsson was credited with 38 chances created from corner kicks alone. There are a number of reasons why this could be problematic. While Sigurdsson's delivery is undoubtedly impressive, these are generally considered difficult opportunities to convert - often headers that are being won under pressure amidst a crowd of bodies.
Sigurdsson created more chances from set plays than anyone else
That the number is so high surely owes much to the abilities of his targets in the penalty box. Eleven of those chances created from corners found their way to 6'4" striker Fernando Llorente, renowned for his heading ability. A further 13 were to Alfie Mawson, a young defender who scored seven goals in a season at both Barnsley and Wycombe Wanderers.
Next on the list? That's Mawson's fellow defender Federico Fernandez. Indeed, defenders were the recipients of the majority of these chances - a reflection of the fact that more than two thirds of all chances created by Sigurdsson were headers. Fernandez got on the end of five corners without finding the net. In fact, only one of them was even on target.
Sigurdsson enjoyed arguably the best season of his career in 2016/17
Just because Llorente, Mawson and Fernandez are capable of diverting an outswinging corner in the general direction of the goal - and 28 of these 38 chances were from right-wing corners - does not necessarily mean the numbers are transferable to another club. Tellingly, only three of these corners actually resulted directly in Swansea goals.
Of course, expertise from set plays is not a negative. The fact that Swansea ranked in the top three in the Premier League for both headed and set-piece goals was a huge factor in their survival. Everton would surely look to put Sigurdsson on corners and free-kicks in the expectation that he can help to boost their own numbers in this regard.
Moreover, the fact that this skill is such a big part of Sigurdsson's game adds context to the question marks over his age relative to his price. While he could be on the cusp of a downturn in output at 28, his set-piece delivery is unlikely to suffer into this thirties. That will bring confidence that he will be a useful asset for the full length of his next contract.
Swansea boss Paul Clement admits Sigurdsson could leave
However, it is vital that Everton appreciate what they would be getting for their £50m investment. While the headline numbers put Sigurdsson in the top bracket of Premier League creators alongside Kevin De Bruyne, Christian Eriksen, Mesut Ozil and David Silva, the type and quality of the chances they supply for team-mates are actually very different.
To illustrate the point further, there are 71 players who created more open-play chances than Sigurdsson in the Premier League last season. That included Kevin Mirallas and three other Everton players. Ross Barkley created 54 such chances. Sigurdsson managed only 25 - the same number that Gareth Barry and Idrissa Gueye produced in fewer games.
Even from set plays, it is uncertain how much of an impact that Sigurdsson might have at Everton given that Barkley, Mirallas and Baines shared the team's set-piece duties last term, creating 51 opportunities in the process - only one fewer than Sigurdsson. A quality player then, but one whose £50m signature comes with considerable caveats. Buyer beware.
k_e_v_2001
Player Valuation: £25k
He is twice the player Barkley is.
peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
They've been suggesting that some form of tapping up has been going on.....
everton2004
Player Valuation: £35m
Who would you go for instead of Siggy?
He's English as well.
I don't know why people are surprised at Walker's fee. It was always going to be circa £50m.
Deckard2049
Player Valuation: £15m
Another poster above you listed a name of similar players at other clubs. All transferred in from outside this country. I honestly don't buy into this whole difficulty adapting thing. Quality is quality, whatever the league. The league is probably the most diverse in Europe and each season it shows.
I just can't get behind this deal completely- especially in a world where Coutinho cost 8.5 million.
- Status