Sigurdsson is a good player, I've said that from the start. And I think he'd play well for us too
But when you take into account the fee and the fact he's essentially Barkley's replacement, I can fully understand anyone having reservations
We ultimately don't know the contract amount we've given Barkley, we're just going off rumours, but surely if we can afford to blow 40 Million plus on a decent Premier League player we can also afford to go back to the table and give Ross some kind of increased financial incentive to stay?
That doesn't strike me as being an unreasonable stance to have
Ross is younger, home grown and it would cost us less to give him an improved contract than it would to sign Sigurdsson. There's nothing wrong with doing so
My hopes for moshiri weren't just that we'd sign loads of players, but that his financial clout would ensure we could KEEP the players we used to always lose. I'm seeing column A here but I'm not seeing column B, and that worries me