Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but its presentation is the issue: the way they've allowed that mundane matter of fact be weaponised yearly assessment to fire at Everton. That was the substance (the 'something') I spoke of.I don't really buy that - it's just low-hanging fruit to me.
The Times needed a story that was different and threw it forward. Everton's accounts, like every other club's accounts, will be looked at and audited by the PL in March next year. That will be for the 3-year period between July 1, 2020 and June 30, 2023.
Everton are well in the clear when it comes to transfer fees in that period and will have cut down massively on wages, as the report states was the one accepted mitigating factor this time around.
But it's a story that's come out of nothing but is obviously based in common sense.
Yeah I don't get this either. There are two very different questions we're looking at.I don’t understand why people think you have to pick a side between the club and the league. It’s obvious that we’re in this position because of our idiotic cowboy of an owner, but that doesn’t mean that the scale of the punishment we’ve received is right and fair. Why people have to make everything a black or white issue I don’t know.
The scab 6 definitely didn't want to leave the PL .
They wanted their cake and to eat it
They wanted to be part of the so called ESL and PL.
If Chelsea & Man City are guilty we would have prize money for 2 extra places for 3 years which would be £12m approx. I think of the alleged £19m so how can they work out our actual overspend until all outstanding investigations covering the period are completed?
Hard for any of us to know. When the transfer when through the financials will probably have depended on the terms of the contract. It could have gone through the accounts before all the money was paid - this is common where deals are paid in instalments.When did we officially receive the Moise Kean money? Just thinking about this then, if he hadn’t been sent on a stupid two year loan and it was just a one year loan with an obligation to buy, would we have received that money in 2021/22 and therefore been under the threshold?
Leeds will have all the details they need to sue too, even non public stuff.Burnley and Leeds are both owned by American investors. If there is money to be had out of us (which would ease their own financial concerns) you'd imagine they'll try their luck, the wider sporting context probably won't even register in their thinking.
Saints and Leicester, goodness only knows.
I don’t understand why people think you have to pick a side between the club and the league. It’s obvious that we’re in this position because of our idiotic cowboy of an owner, but that doesn’t mean that the scale of the punishment we’ve received is right and fair. Why people have to make everything a black or white issue I don’t know.
Oh I completely agree.It would have been filtered down over a few years if it was successful. The PL would have been used like sides use the carabao cup and rested players for their closed shop league.
They just massively read the room wrong that nobody wanted it. The scabby fcks.
Not sure it matters when the cash was received. That helps or hinders cash flow. I think the wording of the agreement would determine how the payment would be accounted for and in which seasonsWhen did we officially receive the Moise Kean money? Just thinking about this then, if he hadn’t been sent on a stupid two year loan and it was just a one year loan with an obligation to buy, would we have received that money in 2021/22 and therefore been under the threshold?
Should have never put his name on that bedsheet. Now look at us.Yes, Graeme Sharp would have had this situation sewn up by now!