'Slither of hope' is actually an appropriate term to use. In this context, it's not a typo.Given the PL is run by a bunch of snakes, that's a very apt typo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'Slither of hope' is actually an appropriate term to use. In this context, it's not a typo.Given the PL is run by a bunch of snakes, that's a very apt typo.
Looking forward to hearing what Dave has to say post meeting.
Pretty sure Richard Masters hasn't met a fan like him before
If you mean a small bit it's spelt sliver.'Slither of hope' is actually an appropriate term to use. In this context, it's not a typo.
That is what I fully expect happenedI don't think it particularly matters the order or the time allocated to each. Both issues are intertwined.
If Masters was stood up claiming they don't need independent regulation and then they moved onto Everton, it makes him loom as competent as a Sunak cabinet minister.
Exactly.That is what I fully expect happened
WooshIf you mean a small bit it's spelt sliver.
It's not double jeopardy though. It's a different period, even though there is overlap, and they would have had 12 months to rectify the situation. It's not as if they're helpless the two years after the breach, and in your scenario effectively P&S wouldn't apply for the next two years, which is illogical given the breach.You misunderstand me.
In three years time, yes, of course you'd be correct.
But me thinks you don't understand the meaning of 'double-jeopardy'.
If weve been found guilty of breaching something, it shouldn't be possible to be charged again for the same thing. (Ah... but we're dealing with the Premier League)
You can only get one speeding ticket for one offence. You cam only be relegated once, however many divisions. Therefore, with a verdict having been reached, to me the 'clock' should now be reset and those years disregarded.
I hope it's not you defending our position at the appeal!
Get off your knees.We aren’t innocent though. We have admitted we broke the rules. Rules that we signed up to abide by. It may be an arbitrary figure, but it’s a figure we agreed to.
The issue isn’t about our guilt or innocence. That’s concluded. And we are guilty.
The issue is the extent of punishment.
And the fact that all the mitigating factors were basically ignored.
The fact that there was no punishment laid out in the rules so they could be as harsh as they want.
The fact that it’s not really independent as the panel chair is paid by the PL as are the panel members.
The fact that they have given us a harsher punishment than going into administration.
The fact that they briefed the media about the punishment they wanted.
The fact that the panel haven’t explained how they got to 10 points.
The fact that we have been given a sporting punishment rather than a financial one because our “owner is wealthy” when there is plenty of precedence already set for fining owners/clubs.
And then the fact that we are being censored by companies in cahoots with the PL such as Sky.
Our type of club: one with the fanbase and stadium and ability to attract big investors.Well no, FFP wasnt designed to beat down our club, thats just honestly crazy talk.
It's one of those strange ones.If you mean a small bit it's spelt sliver.
Our type of club: one with the fanbase and stadium and ability to attract big investors.
He wasn't a big investor. He was Everton's Shinawatra - the owner before the big investor.We had big investors, they bottled it. P&S can't protect us from incompetence.
He wasn't a big investor. He was Everton's Shinawatra - the owner before the big investor.