Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

6 + 2 Point Deductions

Hope we pull safe no matter what, people at the top really don't want us to move in our new ground as a premier league club.. premier league mafia at work here...
 
They won't get the same or similar punishment IMO as they'll see it as historical issues. Both their lawyers will tie they up in riddles and they'll get a slap on the wrist.
They only need to stretch it out to the point the regulator is brought in, where it has already been said points deductions won’t be applied for financial infractions. Couldnt make it up really. Send the ref to check the monitor
IMG_0949.webp
 

Just one thing, i dont know if i am thnking in a strange way, but thought the panel was supposedly independent and should be their own decision. The way it was worded is like they took advice from prem league and agreed with them, we needed to be punished

Same way reports came out on the 25th about the league, saying they want us deducted 12points when the hearding didnt end till 27th October - Surely gives the panel ideas
 

It's not about them being in control of the finances, it's the idea to take action if they feel a club are heading a certain direction. Hence why we were in close communication.

If this wasn't the case, we'd have spunked more money rather than be the lowest spenders in the league for about 3 seasons.

But by your and I'm guessing the commission opinion, the club was spectacularly naive to even be in close communication with the PL in regards to our financial situation. Because it was the belief that if there were any worries and concerns the PL would've advised or intervened.

They didn't. Other clubs threatened to sue but the PL responded by saying we were compliant.

If being in communication with the PL meant nothing we wouldn't have done it.
The mouthpiece tweet says that everything was done under PL scrutiny. 1. That’s not really possible and 2. It’s irrelevant. Read the report. Each time EFC ran a transaction by them the PL was clear that it wasn’t responsible for keeping EFC in compliance.

It’s not a mitigating factor. If they had done that and kept below 105 mil they wouldn’t have been in front of the commission. Alternatively, if they hadn’t been in consultation with the PL and went over the 105, they’d be right where they are.

Instead, they made mistakes, assumed they could apply interest to the money Moshiri was putting in and got burned
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top