The only question that should matter is what to do they bring to the table what value to they add.
There is no evidence to suggest that they improve the management of any other asset they own and they are coming in to run the club.
There is no evidence that they provide investment either to provide cashflow to the club or reduce debt.
Thus they have no value to us.
What's their motivation - they set up two company's - one a holding company for their shareholding, the second a management company - the management company charges exorbernent fees to run the club and then this money is shared amongst the partners. The long term play is the hope that asset might appreciate. At worst the asset fails or you sell it on before - but in the meantime the partners make huge money through the management company.
These are vultures. Protests should start immediately - this weekend.
We're in a for short sharp shock, if you think previous owners have been bad................