And if the victim didn’t press charges and wanted it downplayed? She’d be as unhappy as the fans by the leak.
I agree. But that's why we need some clarity here.
Just a couple of things to say mate:
Firstly nothing has actually come from the alleged victim has it? If DBB has stated that she has been assaulted, that would be enough. But at present we have a leak, from I dont know who.
I could say that Arianna Grande has been assaulted. But that doesnt make it true and it shouldnt be treated with the same valour as an incident reported by a victim. I'm fully on board with supporting victims, but that is different from supporting an unnamed person, who's gender us unknown who has made a statement.
2) The second is more thorny, and one which causes a lot of discussion with my partner (who's a researcher in the VAWG sector) which is there are other considerations, other than the victim. It is important the victim is at the heart of any investigative process, but there are other stakeholders here. This is especially so with a football club, who has a standing in the community. So we need to get to the bottom of it.
It would be like if someone had racially abused someone. I'd fully understand if the victim didnt want it pursued further, but that's not the only concern. That person shouldnt be allowed back at the ground. There ought to be a consequence.
So for me, we need to get to the bottom of this.
As I think I mentioned earlier, there was an NUT rep who was accused of this, for campaigning against the Free School. The club acknowledged no wrongdoing had happened. Thank goodness we didnt just accept the version of events as automatically the truth.