Oh me neither mate, I just think he’s better than Solanki which your comment grouped him in withYeah, maybe. I still don't see how a figure of £30m can be reached for Broja.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh me neither mate, I just think he’s better than Solanki which your comment grouped him in withYeah, maybe. I still don't see how a figure of £30m can be reached for Broja.
I don't know...Sterling looks like he’s on his way to Chelsea.
Broja maybe about to leave too…?
Livramento is crocked, will not be fit to well into the season and his injury is likely to rob him of pace sadly.Ward-Prowse and Livramento are still there, despite avaricious glances from several clubs. They have been selling them in the past, but it looks as though their management have realised that one cannot keep dismantling a team, if one wishes to stay in the Premier League.
If Ronaldo ends up going there (skeptical he'd be allowed to) he's definitely off. A loan could be ideal for both sides honestly. Still a lot to prove. But I'd prefer West Ham if I were him.Sterling looks like he’s on his way to Chelsea.
Broja maybe about to leave too…?
That would actually be a bad move for him imo. Moyes tends to setup like Ralph was in the second half of the season and that's when Broja's game started to suffer.If Ronaldo ends up going there (skeptical he'd be allowed to) he's definitely off. A loan could be ideal for both sides honestly. Still a lot to prove. But I'd prefer West Ham if I were him.
I do understand the point but I just think it’s a bit simplistic. The truth is Chelsea have shedloads of players who will leave on a free or hang around for years without ever doing anything, they’re famous for it. Liverpool do too. The difference is they also have some very good young players who end up not being able to make the breakthrough there but are still good players in their own right. The day we have players not even able to get in our match day squad who would be stars at half the teams in the league is the day we can start expecting to get good money for our cast offs.I get that.
But my point is different as I'm not comparing the academy players. I'm saying we're not active with ours. We let ours whittle down their contracts because we have zero structure in place. We barely send them on loan, we don't give them senior game time. That needs to change to even look at making money on them.
Simms - 21. Blackpool and Hearts. 3 months loans. 17 goals. 2 years on his contract. What we doing with him?
Broja - 20. Vitesse and Southampton. Full season loans. 20 goals. 4 year contract left. Chelsea want £30mill.
See the difference? Not comparing the players ability...but more the direction and structure. Chelsea have there's. We don't. Hence a player like Simms will just float on our books rather than us actively either give him game time...or sell him.
I do understand the point but I just think it’s a bit simplistic. The truth is Chelsea have shedloads of players who will leave on a free or hang around for years without ever doing anything, they’re famous for it. Liverpool do too. The difference is they also have some very good young players who end up not being able to make the breakthrough there but are still good players in their own right. The day we have players not even able to get in our match day squad who would be stars at half the teams in the league is the day we can start expecting to get good money for our cast offs.
NOT INCLUDED IN TOURSterling looks like he’s on his way to Chelsea.
Broja maybe about to leave too…?
If Ronaldo ends up going there (skeptical he'd be allowed to) he's definitely off. A loan could be ideal for both sides honestly. Still a lot to prove. But I'd prefer West Ham if I were him.
I do understand the point but I just think it’s a bit simplistic. The truth is Chelsea have shedloads of players who will leave on a free or hang around for years without ever doing anything, they’re famous for it. Liverpool do too. The difference is they also have some very good young players who end up not being able to make the breakthrough there but are still good players in their own right. The day we have players not even able to get in our match day squad who would be stars at half the teams in the league is the day we can start expecting to get good money for our cast offs.
Don’t know if you are aware but Saints wont till the 22/23 season have paid a £ for LivramNeto and our buy back kicks in at the start of next season.Ward-Prowse and Livramento are still there, despite avaricious glances from several clubs. They have been selling them in the past, but it looks as though their management have realised that one cannot keep dismantling a team, if one wishes to stay in the Premier League.
He is not going on Chelsea's pre season trip according to an article on Goodison News. Interesting if true