Each to their own. I thought he was excellent against Chelsea, and what 'he does' was showcased perfectly by taking the ball from Lukaku in a tight space on the touch-line, then giving it back to him in the run up to Naismith's second goal.
Against Spurs again, kept us up the pitch by retaining possession and bringing Barkley into play.
Think 'bang average' is massively harsh.
he's absolutely crap mate. theres no harshness about it. People are focusing on his one good attribute of being neat and tidy and ignoring the rest of his play that makes him awful.
he's playing wide midfield, he hardly ever gets a cross in, he wont properly support the full back offensively or defensively because his positioning on the right is absolutely turd.
he can't take on players because he doesn't have the skill, pace, or quickness of feet, and he wont track back or know how to defend because he's a bang average striker who is even more average on the wing.
He's been in a team thats done okay, but that doesn't directly relate to him, apart from southampton, thats literally his only 'good' performance. Other than that, he's been just average.
He shouldn't be keeping lennon, del, mirallas out the team by a long shot. Lennon offers exactly the same as him in the link up play department, whilst offering way more offensively and defensively..
and as for del and mirallas, both of them offer more goals, more assists an are about ten times better than him at every attacking aspect.