Ive got no problem with them either when they’re used effectively. What I didn’t tolls to see was our previous style of ply which would be the keeper rolling it out to a centreback who would then line up a long punt into a corner and have all nine other players running after it. That goes nowhere against top sides as we’ve seen.
Sure our football has broken down loads of times this season but a lot of the errors have been made from us trying to at least play out. Yes we end up going back to the keeper way too much but with better players this happens less and less and before you know it you have a team who can keep the ball along the back line and find the likes of James in space to spring attacking players, we’ve seen more through balls this season than an at any point since Martinez and Deulofeu were here.
Carlo takes criticism for not working on a style of play or implementing a philosophy. I think he has taken a harder choice to try and train some principles of possession based football into players but ultimately they’re not good enough. I still remember Keane and Siggurdson somehow both falling over a stationary ball agaisnt Palace that they were both favourites to win and we ended up defending a counterattack because the simple truth is that apart from a few players, most of the squad cannot handle playing a possession game.
Coleman’s technique is utterly abysmal and he struggles to find a pass and finds crossing a ball impossible. Siggurdson is lucky if he ever sees a second touch after his abysmal first one. Ditto Gomes, who wouldn’t be able to not overhit a 5 yard ball even if he did get a pass off. Davies the same. They all know this so they panic and go back to the defenders where we have Baresi himself Michael Keane ready to take an uncertain touch and lunge after it.
At the moment it’s a chain with several broken links but if we replace even one of them let’s say the right back for example, suddenly he’s played a decent ball infield and the midfielder had received it with a bit more time. That means they can then play slightly better ball to the next person. Rather than this cos tang hot potato we have now, the patterns Ancelotti coaches them to ply are suddenly looking a lot easier. It results in attackers getting the ball with more time to fishing better.
Ancelotti is not a manager who favors ball possession, but who likes his teams to be more direct. Of course there are nuances here, but even in Real Madrid he favored a more direct style. They played counter-football, which he was eventually criticized for. So I can hardly imagine him starting to implement it at Everton.
I will not criticize Ancelotti for the results. Considering the injury situation, we have taken a lot of points, which I agree with you. But I think we have also been extremely lucky with the results. What I am more skeptical of, and here I hope I am wrong, is that with this type of football we have reached the ceiling. With this type of football, we have not laid any foundation that we can develop further next season. In many ways, we have sacrificed long-term success for short-term "success". The same can be said about player logistics.
This is where I think Leicester have done a lot right. They have acknowledged that they can not compete with the big clubs financially, and must therefore have a completely different model. They have a clear football philosophy, and allow players to develop within this framework. They have a clear and distinct player logistics, and buy players who are mostly in the right age group, develop them, and sell them expensively.
Since they have a manger with a clear football philosophy, they also know what types of players they want and how they can use them and develop them. If, for example, we had brought a similar player like Tielemans (who was not such a good football player in Monaco) to today's Everton, do you think he would have been a success?