So would I if he was replacing Isaak
Why dont you rate Isak?
Gilbert..
Player Valuation: £50m
People glance at Wiki.
Or the narrative is set - struggling relegation team, lack of fitness and headlines around xG.
I get it, but it's lacking/short term.
He looks over his fitness problems that Everton compounded, and Everton have been a basket case.
trueblue84
Player Valuation: £50m
Maybe a poor choice of words. I mean I'm not a fan. He's obviously a good player.
Are the Milan links genuine or is that just the papers putting 2 and 2 together because they need a Giroud replacement?
Gilbert..
Player Valuation: £50m
You asked why Newcastle fans hated the idea. It would be similar if Everton were in for a striker with those same stats.
My take on him has always been the same. You cant get a season out of him without either injuries or a goal drought.
I mean its nailed on he leaves and turns into Marco Van Basten.
He’s a good player for sure, but definitely unfulfilled potential. My main beef with selling him is my lack of faith we’ll replace him. I mean apart from Lukaku you’re doing back to Duncan Ferguson to the last time we had a good striker and even he never achieved his full potential.
Blast_of_Cannock
Player Valuation: £8m
They're Newcastle fans. Not the brightest.
Goodisongang
Player Valuation: £20m
Wasnt that miss where he chested it down and somehow vollied it over against newcastle as well?
if it was, probably what sticks out most to them ( that and his poor goal record )
in a nutshell, they'd be replacing an injury prone striker who always scores goals, with an injury prone striker who doesn't.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £40m
Used to be they loved nothing more than a good old-fashioned number nine. Lost their values.
If you take the glasses off for a minute.
What would YOU say if we were linked with spending 37 million quid on a fella with 14 league goals in 3 seasons?
