I don't feel any shame at all. FFP is an establishment tool designed to protect the cartel from any interlopers. It masquerades as 'fair' when it is anything but that at all. Cheating, to me, is bribing match officials and taking drugs. You have a club less than a mile from your own that is allowed to cheat in plain sight - hacking another team's scouting database, a ludicrous £50m FFP allowance for a stadium that doesn't exist, the abuse of therapeutic use exemptions, and intimidation of match officials after one bad decision to successfully ensure that they won't be on the end of an adverse decision for the rest of the season, etc. Our owner regenerated a deprived area in east Manchester, their owners de-gentrify the area and drive out local residents. Does anyone call them out over any of this?
I don't know if Sheikh Mansour personally put money into our sponsors' coffers to prop up contracts. It's not impossible to envisage that this happened but, equally, he's a well-connected man who has friends in Abu Dhabi who want a piece of the pie - perfectly allowable under the rules at the time. The point here is that this is a difficult and complex case brought about after a magazine published six emails from a hack that stole millions of files from the club. Did you know that the said magazine spliced together two emails that were sent two years apart to present a totally different context to make us look guilty? When others play dirty then I'm less sensitive about upholding the Corinthian spirit.
All I really want is for people to be open-minded and look at the facts of the case as and when they are presented. If people aren't prepared to do that then they're prejudiced. That being the case, I can't penetrate closed minds that are already made up, so it's just as convenient for me to spare everyone an argument and say we're guilty but I hope we get off by hook or by crook. Truth is, none of us yet know.