Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When the £28m was rejected, most on here were saying "£35m and they'll be gone". Now we reject £36-£38m (depending on which report) and people are saying £40m and they'll be gone.
Notice a pattern there?
100% that latest offer wasn't £36m-£38m hard cash. It was probably something ridiculous like £25m upfront and the all kinds of add one based on appearances, champions league wins etc etc.
In my eyes £38m hard cash would have been accepted.
That rates Fellaini at £23m and a 29 year old Baines at £15m.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...fer-news/moyes-ready-launch-final-40m-5816499
£40m bid coming our way, apparently.
The thing is, why would United give us £20m for Baines now knowing that if he doesn't sign a new contract they can get him for a whole lot less in 12 months time.
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co...fer-news/moyes-ready-launch-final-40m-5816499
£40m bid coming our way, apparently.
If that's for both of them: REJECT. As the dealine gets closer the fee should go UP, not down.
If we believe what the media and twitter saying:
Barry on loan
McCarthy 15M rising to 20M
Tom Ince 8M rising to 10M
Add in the first year's wages for each of them and you're looking at more than £36m outlay, leaving less than £10m to pay the sell-on clause and look for one more player. IMHO that would be bad business. If Ince and McCarthy could be secured for a combined £15m - £20m then maybe, but not at the prices you've listed.
Seeing as you asked so nicely.Not being funny but I'll be disgusted if we pay more then £40 million for these two. Baines we straight up do not need, ridiculous waste of money and Fellaini is about our 14th choice and my personal 34th choice.
Stop being mean and give us them for 35m.