PeregrineT
Player Valuation: £35m
Good point, Danjuma was terrible and barely an option and yet Dyche played him in 20 matches. Good example of him being willing to rotate and use whatever options he has.Danjuma was an option
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Good point, Danjuma was terrible and barely an option and yet Dyche played him in 20 matches. Good example of him being willing to rotate and use whatever options he has.Danjuma was an option
Wasn't his last game in November or something?Good point, Danjuma was terrible and barely an option and yet Dyche played him in 20 matches. Good example of him being willing to rotate and use whatever options he has.
Good point, Danjuma was terrible and barely an option and yet Dyche played him in 20 matches. Good example of him being willing to rotate and use whatever options he has.
At first glance looks a natural replacement for Onana. 6'5 DM, no idea about his technical attributes though.@Goat would love him, he is HUGE
Dyche has been a manager for more than enough time to know exactly how he operates and what his default setting is. He does things the way he does them, because that's how he's always done them. We may not have lots of quality options all around the pitch, but we do have a guy who plays the same style every week no matter what, the same formation every week no matter what, usually the same players, same tactical plan, same subs at the same time etc. "Change" is not a word I would associate with Dyche.We don't know how much he'd change it if he had the opportunity to but even if he wouldn't change it much we still need options there definitely at least one more player in my opinion and I wouldn't mind two.
I agree to a point. But at no point during his tenure here or at Burnley would he have got better results playing expansive football.Dyche has been a manager for more than enough time to know exactly how he operates and what his default setting is. He does things the way he does them, because that's how he's always done them. We may not have lots of quality options all around the pitch, but we do have a guy who plays the same style every week no matter what, the same formation every week no matter what, usually the same players, same tactical plan, same subs at the same time etc. "Change" is not a word I would associate with Dyche.
That doesn't contradict what i'm saying at all though I've said today in his thread we know he won't change that much and we know he values players who work hard and keep their tactical discipline. If he had the option to take one player with those attributes and replace them with another player who also has them then he'd probably make more changes than he does when he's replacing a player who does the things he likes with one who doesn't which would have been the case last year it seems pretty obvious to me anyway.Dyche has been a manager for more than enough time to know exactly how he operates and what his default setting is. He does things the way he does them, because that's how he's always done them. We may not have lots of quality options all around the pitch, but we do have a guy who plays the same style every week no matter what, the same formation every week no matter what, usually the same players, same tactical plan, same subs at the same time etc. "Change" is not a word I would associate with Dyche.
Egg. Before the egg was chicken -1. It's evolution. Totally agree with the rest.Chicken and egg. There was no one good enough to rotate those two with most of the season so who knows if he would have.
The DoF should be providing the manager with two good options for each position, or as close to it as possible.
I agree to a point. But at no point during his tenure here or at Burnley would he have got better results playing expansive football.
I get what you're saying. It could all be a bit moot of course, as I suspect Dyche will be out the door once the takeover goes through (assuming it does).That doesn't contradict what i'm saying at all though I've said today in his thread we know he won't change that much and we know he values players who work hard and keep their tactical discipline. If he had the option to take one player with those attributes and replace them with another player who also has them then he'd probably make more changes than he does when he's replacing a player who does the things he likes with one who doesn't which would have been the case last year it seems pretty obvious to me anyway.
Who do you think they want to replace him with?I get what you're saying. It could all be a bit moot of course, as I suspect Dyche will be out the door once the takeover goes through (assuming it does).
Who knows - I guess it that would be a question for whatever sporting people the new owners want in place, and what their objectives are.Who do you think they want to replace him with?
About 100 senior games plus 7 international caps and will turn 23 mid season so he's not exactly a kid who we'd need to wait years for you wouldn't think.The type of signing we have to make . But also need those to start immediately.
Sell onana and get in this lad and Ndidi.
Gallardo is a free man I think?? I know what you mean about wanting success, but I wonder if they’ll stick with him for a season for stability?Who knows - I guess it that would be a question for whatever sporting people the new owners want in place, and what their objectives are.
They had one of the most successful managers in the history of the game at Roma and delivered a European trophy, so I doubt the extent of their ambition will be to stick with a guy whose greatest achievement in a dozen years of management is once finished in the top half of the table.