Hogwild
Player Valuation: £30m
Sadly it looks like you may be right….We don't have £17.5m
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sadly it looks like you may be right….We don't have £17.5m
Sell to who? Which club with tens of millions to spend needs a GK? I can't think of a single one.Agree with this on Pickford completely.
If we can sell now is the time. Get cash in, to aid transfers for other positions.
We can't afford a cannon that big or powerful unfortunately.The board and owner don't just need to go they need to be fired off in cannons to the moon.
We can't afford a cannon that big or powerful unfortunately.
Might be able to borrow an extra-bouncy bouncy castle or overpowered see-saw if we move some money around?!?...
It wouldn't surprise me (or at least not until post January when maybe we sell 1 or 2 fringe players for a bit of cash).I'll wager we won't play him beyond the financial trigger this season.
This, no Prem team needs a new keeper, unless he went abroardSell to who? Which club with tens of millions to spend needs a GK? I can't think of a single one.
I know that they have a 60,000 seater stadium - and charge some fans £3,000 a year - but like you say, they have a negative net spend of around £400m over the past 5 years - whilst ours over the same period is about £100mOne thing that confuses me is that Arsenal have a negative net spend of about -£500m once the Zinchenko deal is accounted for over the last 5 seasons, compared to our approx -£120m. I know we’ve paid over the odds on wages and they’ve been in Europe once or twice, but they’ve not been champions league every year. They can’t be bringing in that much more revenue whilst spending so much less on wages. Surely.
It’s just baffling how they’re allowed to keep spending whilst we’re completely hamstrung.
If someone could explain it to me I’d genuinely appreciate it.
Arsenal revenue ~€367m paOne thing that confuses me is that Arsenal have a negative net spend of about -£500m once the Zinchenko deal is accounted for over the last 5 seasons, compared to our approx -£120m. I know we’ve paid over the odds on wages and they’ve been in Europe once or twice, but they’ve not been champions league every year. They can’t be bringing in that much more revenue whilst spending so much less on wages. Surely.
It’s just baffling how they’re allowed to keep spending whilst we’re completely hamstrung.
If someone could explain it to me I’d genuinely appreciate it.
Only one would be Spurs from Sky 6 but maybe not til next summerThis, no Prem team needs a new keeper, unless he went abroard
It's had the look of Lerner's Villa for a while now.I’m afraid once you start circling the drain, it usually only ends up one way.
One thing that confuses me is that Arsenal have a negative net spend of about -£500m once the Zinchenko deal is accounted for over the last 5 seasons, compared to our approx -£120m. I know we’ve paid over the odds on wages and they’ve been in Europe once or twice, but they’ve not been champions league every year. They can’t be bringing in that much more revenue whilst spending so much less on wages. Surely.
It’s just baffling how they’re allowed to keep spending whilst we’re completely hamstrung.
If someone could explain it to me I’d genuinely appreciate it.
I don’t want to worry you but there is talk that you are one of a couple of PL clubs that have asked about Michy Batshuayi and not about a loan.