I think the 'Everton' style is to play quick football whether thats going direct to the forwards / wide players or quick passes forwards on the floor...
...its not slow tiki taka football.
Its obvious that you cant just knock it long to wingers to endlessly cross the ball in, and its also obvious that you cant just pass the ball quickly down the centre...
...it has to be a mix.
What you get from McNeil is primarily someone who looks to play forwards and can cross the ball (really well) and pass (really well) while also working hard defensively.
Hes more of a Limpar than a Kanchelskis.
@Dwight K Schrute named Wamangituka who, for example looks to be more of a Kanchelskis than a Limpar.
What we need is 3 players out wide to rotate with different skill sets and a 4th experienced or young player as backup.
United in the early 90s had Giggs, Sharpe and Kanchelskis with Beckham emerging. Thats a variety of different types of wide player.
Im not saying McNeil is as good as those players were but he has a valuable skill set and a left foot which could be considered as 'similar' to Kevin Sheedy. Hes also got 100 games under his belt and has shown that he can play quick football.
If we are to play Richarlison as a 'support striker' / floating around DCL then we need to have better players than Gray and Townsend out wide.
For me, McNeil would be a good player to have as one of three wide players to rotate. As hes young, he should develop and improve, also he will be playing in a better side.
A season with 2 goals and 5 assists with Burnley could well become 4 goals and 10 assists at Everton.
What i would say though, is that if we signed him we would still need 2 more starting wide players to rotate with him.
£30-35mil seems reasonable to me.