I think the main problem is many posters (and this has been raised and refuted before) expect every youth prospect to be a Rooney/Barkley/Gordon, when that just isn't realistic. Only these levels of players are going to break through at that age, but there's no reason a young player shouldn't go out for a couple (seasons of) loans, then be added to the first team squad around 20-22. Now if they are not ready to make it into the first team until this point then it may well be that they are not going to be a Barkley/Gordon/Branthwaite/DCL level first team regular, but they could still be a valuable squad member/rotation/deputy player, and in many ways this is almost more useful. I'd rather have these positions filled with academy products than waste over the top wages and transfer fees on buying players to fill those roles, then save our budget for 1st 11 players who are going to (hopefully) be real difference makers..” If an Academy youngster is sent on loan, I don’t see it as a good sign as far as their future at Everton is concerned, that’s my point.” You’ve said this so many times over the years it becomes pointless having a discussion with you on it , you just keep repeating it again and again and again despite people giving you the evidence to the contrary. You’ve effectively written off Mills because the club decided that at 19 the leap from u21 to PL is too great without him getting experience in mens football first. I’ll leave it there, it’s all a bit pointless.