How long before the BU or others say that Pip Green is behind BHH and it's all a sham for him to get his money back BK
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh and you are, because if you think Everton's net spend is positive then I'd love to know what we paid for the Martinez termination with, same with the frauds staff, same question about paying to release Walsh and paying to get Koeman and his staff, plus paying all their wages.
Yeah, but what are you achieving by telling us how the world is about to end? Over and Kin over.
There's nothing that says our debt has increased and yet you posted that it had, as if it was fact.Where are the worst case scenarios? I'm reacting to the unsubstantiated latest news on this thread, just like loads of people have reacted to the unsubstantiated reports of Moshiri secretly paying off all our debt without informing shareholders. I'll wait until seeing some proper evidence before chosing to believe it or not, but to hear reports that our debt may have increased on the back of no net spend, zero investment and his unbelievably unprofessional text to Jim White is concerning.
oh and you are, because if you think Everton's net spend is positive then I'd love to know what we paid for the Martinez termination with, same with the frauds staff, same question about paying to release Walsh and paying to get Koeman and his staff, plus paying all their wages.
I disagree.Evertons net spend isnt positive tho Ian.
Apologies if true mate, it's just been timely cry arseing then.Where have I said the world is going to end? Where have I said it repeatedly? I haven't even been on here much recently.
Should've said negative. SozWhat are you talking about? I've never said our net spend was positive. Our transfer net spend was negative. The other expenses you talk about have all been paid with club money, there has been no investment, and I find that concerning.
I disagree.
It's not the heads on fire disaster being portrayed either mateI understand people still wanting to paint a positive spin on things, to be honest, the truth is pretty hard to take, we sold a star player and we sold to buy, we left the TV money increase untouched and the only positive people can point to is sacking a failure of a manager and replacing him with another manager.
There's nothing that says our debt has increased and yet you posted that it had, as if it was fact.
Your glass is definitely half empty imo
No not in denial just accepting that he basically owns the club and can say whatever the heck he wants, why don't you get it? This is a business he is in charge you are not, capiche?It still makes me laugh that people are still in denial over that statement.
Jesus Christ lol
Math me up. I'll raise you, you don't want this beef.Dont make me math you Ian.
The figures dont make for pretty reading.
It's not the heads on fire disaster being portrayed either mate