See my reply to Tubey.
I think Tubey has got this for now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See my reply to Tubey.
lol
Just for your information, the sponsored thread generated no more revenue for GOT than any other thread. Even if it had, the only beneficiaries would have been the people who use this site for free. The fact is that the increased traffic on the site costs the owner more given that advertising revenues don't meet costs.
Which didn't happen, therefore mean absolutely nothing.
Again, the fact we could spend £30m on Bolasie immediately after we sold Stones, but couldn't do a peep before Stones was sold or after the Stones money was spent, pretty much confirms we are sell to buy.
Would rather have stayed with BK and Earl?
There is that angle, but for me it does not necessarily show we are selling to buy look at our efforts to get those other targets that would have amounted to more than we got for Stones.
Good.
To be honest if you told me that grass was green I'd check. I am not one of your sycophants on here, in fact I've got my own ideas of why you've posted what you have on sponsored threads all summer but forget it, I'll leave you to it. If I'm not banned of course.
There would be little difference imo
Sorry tubes I don't go on Twitter and I don't know who Dan is?Wow that's stupid... Proper tin foil hat stuff.
Does that explain Twitter too mate? Is Dan a member of the Illuminati whilst we're at it?
Come on... it's quite clear what the score is. Esk is either a liar out for personal attention because he's bored, or he's hopelessly naive, trusts people telling lies to him and doesn't know when to shut up. It doesn't extend further than that.
We lost a couple of players to CL clubs, we tried to spend money, outbid Chelsea for a player, yes Chelsea.So we're just supposed to ignore his madman quotes to Jim White, a negative net spend confirming sell to buy is still a thing and the re-issuing of loans?
RM no doubt would have still been the manager.
Has there been a rebuttal ?so havent not read papers, and only hearing about the echo, or who ever it was saying that the statement was 100% true,do they [the echo/whoever] actually know for a fact that it was moshiri sending the txt,or was it someone pretending to be him
Help me here a bit Tubey, when did Gueye come in?