When he saw through Kenwright ?he was denounced when he was the first to see through Kenwright also, these are dangerous times
That is your opinion, I don't share it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When he saw through Kenwright ?he was denounced when he was the first to see through Kenwright also, these are dangerous times
If someone concocts a scheme to heap £400M onto a club to pay off - a club that fluctuates between small losses and profits each season - is that having due regard for the company?
At a price. The club's assets are not its own. And (as we've discussed on numerous occasions) 40 years is a long time and external conditions WILL change.Yes.
Having a short term repayment vehicle with zero LCC guarantees would'nt though.
At a price. The club's assets are not its own. And (as we've discussed on numerous occasions) 40 years is a long time and external conditions WILL change.
neither did anyone at the time, that pendulum has swung mi amicoWhen he saw through Kenwright ?
That is your opinion, I don't share it.
At a price. The club's assets are not its own. And (as we've discussed on numerous occasions) 40 years is a long time and external conditions WILL change.
Sorry but he wasn't on Martinez was he? ...the great oracle of GOT ?? Jesus wept !!
A misguided opinion that ignores the actual facts
"your"That is you`re opinion ..............
"your"
It's a judgement call, I suppose. It depends on how stable you see the club and the industry. But generally speaking having a mountain of debt overhanging the club for decades isn't a great thing. We needed a commercial partner for this. We'll get a naming rights deal, of course.They will change, of course. And in a way, I understand your misgivings. But, if it ever got to the stage where the club couldnt afford the pretty low repayments, (Sigi was 10 years of them before wages), then Everton would be in Div 3 anyrate, or football would be a busted flush globally.
On balance, I reckon its a considered risk.
It's a judgement call, I suppose. It depends on how stable you see the club and the industry. But generally speaking having a mountain of debt overhanging the club for decades isn't a great thing. We needed a commercial partner for this. We'll get a naming rights deal, of course.
Conditions (of contracts) can change. Other players might insist on it.It is a judgement call. But as I have said for months, the stadium is lift off for LCC/Liverpool Waters. Hence the ridiculously low repayment deal on the SPV thing. (That wont fund the whole thing anyrate, but it will give other players confidence to lob some eggs in the cake).
Then there is debt, and debt. Debt for EFC in our current situation, (Koeman/league all that notwithstanding), is a bad thing. He has effectively removed that from the balance sheet.
Debt with long term, "cheap" repayment vehicle, but with a sparkling iconic ground underpinning it, is way better.
Not perfect granted, but better.