Frang
Player Valuation: £70m
Not a west brom fan mate wba 1983 was my first Everton game 0-0 and it pissed down got soaked but loved it sitting on the barriers in the Gwlady st
nice story would defo read again..
Not a west brom fan mate wba 1983 was my first Everton game 0-0 and it pissed down got soaked but loved it sitting on the barriers in the Gwlady st
Apparently they do, they were talking about it on the radio about a week ago although it's not been announced as to who it's with, unless that is how they want to pay the loans back? i just remember when i heard it and thinking why can't we do that instead of all this guff with shady Joe and his mates.They don't have a naming deal in place though?
They have paid for everything via loans so far.
Im pretty nobody is happy with the way its gone so far, but its a learning phase for Moshiri, im sure as a businessman hes had setbacks before, its not how you fall down, its how you get back up.
Moshiri has taken a tumble in the wet grass, does he stand up and change his shoes or keep sliding down the hill?
My moneys on self made multi billionaire here, but if people wanna keep backing David from Wigan, thats cool.
Wasn't Cocu your preferred dutch fraud?.
Apparently they do, they were talking about it on the radio about a week ago although it's not been announced as to who it's with, unless that is how they want to pay the loans back? i just remember when i heard it and thinking why can't we do that instead of all this guff with shady Joe and his mates.
So, after 10 years ish planning and getting stuff sorted, and a few months before they play a football match there, Spurs have still not announced a naming deal, let alone had a red cent off Soontobeannounced Inc Co then.
Yet some were claiming a £500m naming deal had paid for the build......
And meanwhile, we have yet to see a plan of one seat, yet a naming deal should be in place???
Ok.
Not saying it should be in place it's just another option to look at that's all because let's be honest we are doing sweet F.A at the moment other than a bunch of pathetic little 'workshops' with drawings that look like they have been done by a 5 year old and resemble the average championship ground, i think the whole project is joke at the moment tbh.So, after 10 years ish planning and getting stuff sorted, and a few months before they play a football match there, Spurs have still not announced a naming deal, let alone had a red cent off Soontobeannounced Inc Co then.
Yet some were claiming a £500m naming deal had paid for the build......
And meanwhile, we have yet to see a plan of one seat, yet a naming deal should be in place???
Ok.
Those are mundane restatements of what happened. The meat of the issue is that the sales plus tv cash hike has meant Moshiri hasn't needed to pay for anything other than the things that will make him more money in a future sale: his shares and debt that can be converted to shares.Lukaku wanted out FACT
Stones wanted out FACT
Everyone else got tv money FACT
Don’t go begging to banks FACT
No increases in ticket prices FACT
Nearer to a new ground FACT
Not saying it should be in place it's just another option to look at that's all because let's be honest we are doing sweet F.A at the moment other than a bunch of pathetic little 'workshops' with drawings that look like they have been done by a 5 year old and resemble the average championship ground, i think the whole project is joke at the moment tbh.
They don't have to though, Spurs new stadium is being funded by a £500m naming rights issue and the rest is coming from their deal with the NFL.
So, after 10 years ish planning and getting stuff sorted, and a few months before they play a football match there, Spurs have still not announced a naming deal, let alone had a red cent off Soontobeannounced Inc Co then.
Yet some were claiming a £500m naming deal had paid for the build......
Those are mundane restatements of what happened. The meat of the issue is that the sales plus tv cash hike has meant Moshiri hasn't needed to pay for anything other than the things that will make him more money in a future sale: his shares and debt that can be converted to shares.
Those are mundane restatements of what happened. The meat of the issue is that the sales plus tv cash hike has meant Moshiri hasn't needed to pay for anything other than the things that will make him more money in a future sale: his shares and debt that can be converted to shares.
Last two seasons under Kenwright we saw net spends of £28M and £36M. If he'd had Stones and Lukaku to sell the net spend would have been as much as the net spend over the last two Moshiri controlled seasons....and I daresay the choice of manager he'd have made and the overseeing of spending would have seen better value for money in terms of squad quality.One question to you under kenwright were would we have got or spent £300 million I will take you back to the summer of 2010 are players we brought in were Jan mucha no fee .mageye Gaeye £ under a mill.joao silva half a mill and beckford no fee .all under kenwrights watch so how would be in a better position without moshiri I admit he made mistakes but at least he is spending on players and looking at a new ground neither was never gonna happen under kenwright the last 20 years prove that I mean look them players we signed that summer 1and a half mill spent embarrassing