Farhad Moshiri

[Toffeeslam]

Gave an Interest free loan to the club.

Came from him though right ?

 

[Big Fat Sam]

Carpetbagging get @davek

 

[davek]

Prove it

I’ve asked you many times to provide imperical evidence on many issues in the past but was disappointed

Here your chance to surprise me

I've proven it mant times.

Anyway, I'm reasonably happy we'll get at least two of thiose in to make a difference...which will make a big change from the utter trash Koeman brought in.

 

[CRIMHEAD]

Gave an Interest free loan to the club.

So what? He spent 80M, man. It was his money. And he hasn't stopped buying players.

Does everyone realize ALL the owners did the same thing - Man City, Chelsea - when they took over? Only recently have some of them converted it to equity, which honestly doesn't mean jack when you already own the club and all the equity.

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

Came from him though right ?

Obviously came from him, but it's money he'll get back.

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

No need to do that. O'd cringe more at anyione believing we have a benefactor at the club and that the vast bulk of this summer's spend isn't getting paid for by 14 player leaving, mostly for fees.

He put £150m of his own dosh on the balance sheet mate. I doubt it’s still there.

I’d check your workings out on your net spend calculations btw mate lol

 

[Chimpy Glassman]

Just wow.

 

[Toffeeslam]

Obviously came from him, but it's money he'll get back.

If the value of the club increases due to success on the pitch in fine with that.

 

[davek]

He put £150m of his own dosh on the balance sheet mate. I doubt it’s still there.

I’d check your workings out on your net spend calculations btw mate lol

I think you need to look at the bank loan from the Chinese triggered last month. There's a chunk of this summer's spend right there.

As said mate: money trees - they really dont exist.

 

[LouReedwalkonthewildside]

So what? He spent 80M, man. It was his money. And he hasn't stopped buying players.

Does everyone realize ALL the owners did the same thing - Man City, Chelsea - when they took over? Only recently have some of them converted it to equity, which honestly doesn't mean jack when you already own the club and all the equity.

The club haven't stopped buying players, also, is there any proof that the money spent on players is coming right from his own arse pocket?

 

[MikeH72]

lol lol lol lol lol lol

 

[IV(AC)]

No need to do that. O'd cringe more at anyione believing we have a benefactor at the club and that the vast bulk of this summer's spend isn't getting paid for by 14 player leaving, mostly for fees.

Two standing counts but still swinging
To be admired

About another £20-30m net this Summer alone.

 

[bicycleheader]

Net spend when we factor in eventual fees for the loans of Onyekuru, Williams, Mirallas, Garbutt and Tarashaj (and add them to the £22M already received for Mori and Klaassen) stands at, IMO, roughly £25M-£30M....and there's still time to sell players/loan players with a view to a sale for another two weeks.

So, my prediction of a negative net spend of between £5M and £15M is wrong - as I conceded it would be a few days ago.

It's the spending of a midtable PL club. Which reinforces my overall point that we are past the spendthrift period (which was always based on major player sales anyway)

Brilliant

You did it

You went ahead with the '' Include Transfer fees from next summer'' defense



This will be enjoyable

 

[Foot Long Hot Dog]

I think you need to look at the bank loan from the Chinese triggered last month. There's a chunk of this summer's spend right there.

As said mate: money trees - they really dont exist.

Come back to me when the accounts are out and there’s still £150m in cash sat on the balance sheet mate.

In the meantime have a night off

 

[davek]

Two standing counts but still swinging
To be admired

About another £20-30m net this Summer alone.

So far yes, that's my calculation also. Still a few more to go yet.