Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 107 7.7%
  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,290 92.3%

  • Total voters
    1,397
It's funny really everyone agrees we don't need a lot, but we all have slightly different ideas what we need. We do need a goalkeeper, but what type of keeper we need depends on the improvements of Joel between now and the summer. If we'd have been in goal all season and not the clown I'm pretty sure we'd be in the top 6.

I think the question of the attacker will boil down too where he sees Niasse's future. I think if he sees him as a striker we are ok, with Kone as a third choice. If Kone is moved on I can see a loan move for a forward.

Likewise the future position of Cleverley is important. If he sees him as more of a wide attacking midfielder, I think we are ok in that position but probably a little short in central midfield. If he wants to move Cleverley back maybe a left footed player. My preference would be keeping Cleverley where he is and adding another central midfield player who is a bit more creative. Someone like Cabaye would be fantastic.
Cleverley is an awkward one really isn't he? I couldn't tell you what his definite position is. A good player to have to step in, but if you're bringing in more quality players he's not necessarily going to start too often...which I feel bad about saying because he's a good player who can do a few things reasonably well. He has the ability to get a telling touch here and there.

Niasse: no idea whatsoever. I think we'll be waiting until pre-season until we get a good look at him to judge.
 
The wage cap PL FFP rules were agreed based on the old TV deal that expires at the end of the season, and were only agreed for that timeframe

I can't find anything that explains what the rules are going to be for the next 3 years i.e. that take account of the new TV deal or if there's even going to be any.
 
At this point I personally think there's more chance of Ethiopia landing a man on the moon this summer than us selling Lukaku, but we'll see.

I really really hope you're right, but am just off to the bookies to put a couple of Cheltenham bets on, and will be also investing in Ethiopia landing a man on the moon!
 
Are tv deals included in 'clubs own commercial revenue'? I'd thought not.

I know there's an increase in the amount you can overshoot the excess limit but nowhere near what would be required if Everton are to start competitive wages to keep the big hitters away from star players.

This is from an article in February 2015 Dave, reading through that sounds to me like what the club brings in regardless of source is what FFP will use to anaylse any breach, possibly another reason that European clubs have wet the bed ove rthe premiership tv deal

UEFA president Michel Platini has told RMC he will not consider changing financial fair play (FFP) rules despite the Premier League's five billion pound TV deal, despite complaints from Ligue 1 clubs.

Lyon president Jean-Michel Aulas recently asked UEFA to reconsider how they share out European competition prize money as a result of the English top flight's new agreement.

The deal will see the team that finishes last in the Premier Legaue earn three times as much as the club that wins Ligue 1 during the three years of the deal between 2016 and 2019.

However, having been behind the introduction of FFP, Platini said the huge influx of revenue into the English game was simply the result of market forces at work.

Platini said: "Financial fair play has one principle: you spend the money you make. The English generate a lot of revenue, so they are going to spend a lot of money. The French should just sell their TV rights better.

"But by means of comparison, Anderlecht earn less than the team that finishes last in Ligue 1, but no-one bats an eyelid. People only do that when it's the others who earn more than them.

"The French complain that the English have much more money than them. But they don't complain that all the other European countries don't have as much as them. I'm not going to get involved in national problems. I can't get involved in that."

While the Ligue 1 clubs' own TV deal comes nowhere near the new 5.136 billion pounds ($7.8 billion) agreement, the division has seen its own revenue from broadcasters increase markedly.

With a share of 607 million euros (447 million pounds) over four years between 2012 and 2016, the 20 French top-flight sides will now have a pot of 748.5 million euros (551 million pounds) between them over the following four years through to 2020.

Platini suggested a change in the style of football played in Ligue 1 could improve investment, with English football having a reputation for having a fast tempo compared to its French counterpart which can be defensive.

"It's perhaps necessary to remind certain coaches that you get three points for a win, and if you draw 0-0 it's only a point," the former European Footballer of the Year said.

"Play, open up! It's more a question of mentality. There are very good players and forwards in France. I would like there to be a few more goals. I would like them to play a bit more, to attack."
 

Are tv deals included in 'clubs own commercial revenue'? I'd thought not.

I know there's an increase in the amount you can overshoot the excess limit but nowhere near what would be required if Everton are to start competitive wages to keep the big hitters away from star players.

Throw in on top of the huge margin in regards to FFP that the new broadcast rights deal will give, you need to be in serious breach for several years in a row to get any form of real punishment, IF as we expect Moshiri comes in and over the next couple of years starts massively expanding the revenue stream from the commercial side of thigns, then that will hugely offset andy short term breach we may incur from signing down long term big deals to current star players and for a bit of a transfer splurge this summer
 
@bluestevon

Dave was referring to the PL FFP deal, which limited wages spend increases to £15m over the course of the current TV deal - unless any increment over that was generated by your own commercial (non TV) revenue increases.

The point appears moot in relation to our new owner though, as there doesn't appear to be any new agreement in place for the next 3 years. The current rules expire at the end of this season.
 
@bluestevon

Dave was referring to the PL FFP deal, which limited wages spend increases to £15m over the course of the current TV deal - unless any increment over that was generated by your own commercial (non TV) revenue increases.

The point appears moot in relation to our new owner though, as there doesn't appear to be any new agreement in place for the next 3 years. The current rules expire at the end of this season.

Ahh bugger me, got myself in a muddle over that then, yeah, think any new version of it will be set much higher than the last, has to be as every club will be taking so much more guaranteed income in that not to do so would be laughed at
 

As already explained he's limited to 182 days a year in the UK otherwise he becomes resident in the UK for tax purposes on his global income.

So he won't be just here for a look around an empty Goodison

Relax mate.

Its little snippets of unknown golden information like this that makes me think your a genius (even though I could just do research online) lol
 
Moshiri must be on the board already as we need a minimum of 3 directors. I imagine once the money hit Earl's account (likely only after the ratification last week) he was off like a shot.

Is that the law in the UK ?

As for Moshiri would he need to be on the board or could he not appoint someone else perhaps? Are all other prem clubs major shareholders on the board personally i wonder ?
 
Are tv deals included in 'clubs own commercial revenue'? I'd thought not.

I know there's an increase in the amount you can overshoot the excess limit but nowhere near what would be required if Everton are to start competitive wages to keep the big hitters away from star players.

Dont forget we will offload a lot of players this summer. We "may" have to have 3 or more categories of player in the wage budget and of course the lukaku level at the top we could pay £150k a week no problem.

The only worry is other players agents then asking for rises as well BUT i think common sense would prevail as they would know lukalu and barkley etc are on another level...

I think up to 9 players may be off myself and thats a lot of wages...for new and existing contracts.

I wonder if we may just give Lukaku a lump sum instead or a lump sum every 12months...
 
Ahh bugger me, got myself in a muddle over that then, yeah, think any new version of it will be set much higher than the last, has to be as every club will be taking so much more guaranteed income in that not to do so would be laughed at
Hopefully The Mush can swing us one of those City-type Etihad airways sponsorship deals, whereby our man pumps a hundred million from his Russian comms company or internet/metal business into the club's coffers, swelling the possible wage bill.

I agree with your point about the ground shifting on FFP though - UEFA look like they might have more important matters to worry about, what with the corruption scandal and the challenge from Europe's financial elite clubs and the circus act they threaten to get off the ground.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top