Farhad Moshiri

7+ Years On... Your Verdict On Farhad Moshiri

  • Pleased

    Votes: 107 7.7%

  • Disappointed

    Votes: 1,284 92.3%
  • Total voters
    1,391
hibbo'sclass said:
So the whole host of options thing - name one that doesn't involve a general meeting - unless you're going down the legal route.
Click to expand...

Board members can have a meeting in a hotel in London or at Kenwrights house for a discussion.

Recruitment is a minor issue in the grand scheme of things on the business.

The company identifies the candidates. Then board will probably be the ones doing private candidate interviews. Otherwise its not something that could lead to EGMs or legal action. Its just not that sort of issue.

Otherwise EFC would never get any work done.
 
MoutsGoat said:
Leave Damo alone.
Click to expand...

241797
 
Honestly. @MoutsGoat

Some on here think. They log on. -> Martinez sacked

-> change thread -> New manager hired -> log off.

When everyone knows getting a new manager's contract negotiations completed can take weeks or more.

Its totally unrealistic for people to expect things to just happen at the click of fingers.
 
bizzaro said:
Board members can have a meeting in a hotel in London or at Kenwrights house for a discussion.

Recruitment is a minor issue in the grand scheme of things on the business.

The company identifies the candidates. Then board will probably be the ones doing private candidate interviews. Otherwise its not something that could lead to EGMs or legal action. Its just not that sort of issue.

Otherwise EFC would never get any work done.
Click to expand...
So I'm talking about Mr Moshiri as a shareholder and his ability to remove the Chairman in a theoretical sense, you're talking about recruitment by the board of a new manager.
The mind boggles.
 

hibbo'sclass said:
So I'm talking about Mr Moshiri as a shareholder and his ability to remove the Chairman in a theoretical sense, you're talking about recruitment by the board of a new manager.
The mind boggles.
Click to expand...

Thats what the page you were commenting on was talking about. As if Kenwright was blocking things and you indicated that if Moshiri was not happy with that he could call an EGM.

Why? No need to. So many ifs and buts in the meantime. It was not even relevant to the overriding issues.
 

hibbo'sclass said:
@bizzarro Wasn't commenting on anything other than the fact in law that BK still has power because other people had asserted he hasn't.
If you aren't prepared to accept that and try and make my post something it wasn't, good luck.
People a sight more savvy than yourself picked up on it.
Click to expand...

In law. BK does have some power. However, in law BK has liability for it too. If Moshiri did want to dispute anything.

Either way BK will want to cooperate with his major shareholder and with a proxy on the board. Or he would be a little bit silly.
 
The Esk said:
How can someone with a 13% shareholding be viewed as independent?
Click to expand...

Because he has a fidicary duty to be so as the chairman Esk.

With his deciding vote. Comes responsibility. As a consequence of liability if he does not do so in accordance with the articles of association. the CA etc.

Even then the shareholder can dispute a decision.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Register
Back
Top