Farhad Moshiri

[Woolly Blue]

Plus the fact he's already got £37M clear profit out of his fantastic stewardship of the club.

It's utterly depressing that the old regime remains in place at this club.

Look forward, not back, or it'll eat you up and you'll be forever a miserable sod.

Or something

 

[kithnou]

So has he paid around 49% of a 175m valuation? Between 85-90m? Everton undervalued the price with a promise from him he will invest the rest in the stadium?

 

[royalblue66]

Err... We've been taken over?

Yes, and all sorts being made up, think we will get more media attention now.

 

[bring the ghost on]

 

[toffees1878]

Does that mean they'll turn St Luke's church into a mosque now?

 

[davmaher]

Maybe he was saying 'Everton could be like Leicester City'

Top of the league - that would do me.

 

[LinekersLegs]

So has he paid around 49% of a 175m valuation? Between 85-90m? Everton undervalued the price with a promise from him he will invest the rest in the stadium?

That is the info the Sky journo has.

 

[davek]

Look forward, not back, or it'll eat you up and you'll be forever a miserable sod.

Or something

That's the point though: the past lives on.

Kenwright, Woods, Elstone are all part of the problem at EFC and there they are, still in position.

I really hope we're not wandering into another few years of silent directors standing aside and allowing drift.

As said: its entirely appropriate and reasonable for this new major shareholder to step up and tell us what the script is for the future in this coming week.

 

[Librarian]

 

[Goat]

BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

 

[Woolly Blue]

Just something that came to me earlier.

The scope for growth on the commercial side of things is huge, so many things can and will hopefully be done better, plus its a different era we enter now, with 3 figure fees from our Sky overlords, at least now, to a degree we are "protected" if the bubble ever bursts.

For years we have just needed somebody to just put a little money in now and again, we dont need to spend 000ms every season on players and hell, if "we" have to pay for our own stadia, so be it. As I stated earlier, we are probably operating at around 20% in terms of profit, in my humble NVQ Business Admin Level 1 opinion and the scope to improve that is unmeasurable, we have a loyal worldwide fanbase, granted it doesnt touch Uniteds, Chelseas, Arses and even the vermin across the Park, but most of it is untapped in terms of shirts and other things.

The sponge is soaking, squeeze it Moshy lad, squeeze it and leave it dry on the floor.

It'll take time. To use a management b/s phrase he'll need to manage expectations.

But the commercial side is key to improving the squad more than our competitors can do.

 

[Tubey]

If it were 1 year in the making, why did we allow an exclusivity period to the relatively penniless Yanks?

 

[bring the ghost on]

Yes, and all sorts being made up, think we will get more media attention now.

 

[neil999]

@Donald Twain whats wrong with the deal?! this is as bad as your game of thrones and force awakens hatred lol

 

[fozzy]

I'm not overly fussed about the £50m signings or the ground at the mo.

1st thing this fella has to sort out is our sponsors and retail. Other (if not every) prem club beats us in this area.