Well it means every other side can sign him for free and then use the saved cash to offer him a healthier wage packet. We now have to pay 2m for a player on a free
Yes city paid half his wages but so what? Had we not got him on loan they would have been paying his full wages for a player who wasn't in the team, so we did them a favour
Two sides of the coin mate
You're missing the point. City clearly wanted something, the deal was done last minute, they held the power. They're hardly going to cry over not sending a player out on loan for six months. Our other option to not agreeing the £2m clause was to not get Barry on loan, and based on his performances last season i'd say he was well worth that agreement.