Ok, so for the people who are now saying I told you so on Sigurdsson because he has finally started to show what people hoped he would when we signed him, the 3 goals he scored in the last 2 games have seen him equal last seasons output and we're in October. A great feat, not going to argue, but also shows how relatively anonymous and inconsistent he was last season.
Not a person in here actually wants him to fail. They just wanted him to do what he should've been doing anyway, getting involved, giving us an edge, being a difference maker. If he's not the type of player to be involved more in games (as some have suggested) then he has to at least offer these type of moments on a regular basis, or he is the definition of a passenger.
If he keeps this type of form up, no one will have a problem with him. It's simple really.
It's fine to play a striker who isn't prolific if he offers the team something else, like the way Marcus Bent used to. He worked his arse off for the team and chased everything, allowing the team as a whole to capitalise, so his lack of goals wasn't an issue. Conversely, Jelavic and the Yak, who scored for for fun, once Moyes insisted they play more like Bent, not only did the goals dry up, but they didn't offer the same type of outlet, so it didn't work.
If Sigurdsson was dictating games and being more involved like the way a Silva or an Ericsson or even a peak Arteta did for us, no one would care if he wasn't scoring. But seen as that isn't his game, the goals and the assists are crucial.
Long may they continue.