Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Hilary Benn Sacked From The Shadow Cabinet - wider political debate

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the PLP does not seem to represent the Labour Party membership, but it does represent the wider electorate, who voted for them?

So to solve that, the Labour membership want/should select every Labour candidate in every constituency?

Or have I missed something?

The PLP doesn't represent or have a mandate for anything.

Individual MPs do represent their constituencies and have a mandate to do that from their electorate. You would hope that the electorate would expect their MP to work diligently, especially when the sh*t hits the fan as it has these past few days and the country is in a very real crisis. The last thing I think most people would be wanting them to do what they have been doing.

As for your second point, the local Labour membership does technically select every Labour candidate in every constituency, though over the past couple of decades the centre has fixed selections and parachuted in various people who do not share similar experiences to those who they represent; hence the disconnect between the party and its MPs that is so obvious now.
 
The PLP doesn't represent or have a mandate for anything.

Individual MPs do represent their constituencies and have a mandate to do that from their electorate. You would hope that the electorate would expect their MP to work diligently, especially when the sh*t hits the fan as it has these past few days and the country is in a very real crisis. The last thing I think most people would be wanting them to do what they have been doing.

As for your second point, the local Labour membership does technically select every Labour candidate in every constituency, though over the past couple of decades the centre has fixed selections and parachuted in various people who do not share similar experiences to those who they represent; hence the disconnect between the party and its MPs that is so obvious now.

Its a mess, that is for certain.

All Governments need a viable opposition, whether you agree with them or not. I mean, if they trigger a new leadership vote, and Corbyn stands, he will win. That, with the make up of the current PLP, is not a viable opposition. (And I know, we barely have a viable Government at the moment).

Bonkers really.
 
The PLP doesn't represent or have a mandate for anything.

Individual MPs do represent their constituencies and have a mandate to do that from their electorate. You would hope that the electorate would expect their MP to work diligently, especially when the sh*t hits the fan as it has these past few days and the country is in a very real crisis. The last thing I think most people would be wanting them to do what they have been doing.

As for your second point, the local Labour membership does technically select every Labour candidate in every constituency, though over the past couple of decades the centre has fixed selections and parachuted in various people who do not share similar experiences to those who they represent; hence the disconnect between the party and its MPs that is so obvious now.

Erm... what?
 

There's no happy answer to Labour's problems. If Corbyn stays, it'll be a protracted battle leaving the field wide open to the Tories. If he goes, one part of the wider movement will feel betrayed whether it's the idealists or the social democrats.

Ultimately, doubt it really matters who steers the Titanic. The result will be the same.
 
So the PLP does not seem to represent the Labour Party membership, but it does represent the wider electorate, who voted for them?

So to solve that, the Labour membership want/should select every Labour candidate in every constituency?

Or have I missed something?

No, that is what Corbyn was edging towards.
 

Why should the 55% majority of members leave and join another party? Surely if the MP's are not happy with the direction of the party and the leader their membership elected they should leave and form a new party?
Why do a handful of wealthy millionaires get to override the will of hundreds of thousands of ordinary hard working people who pay their salary?
Superb post ... got it in one
 
This is all getting very sad, even for someone ideologically quite far away from the Labour party like myself.

Whether right or wrong, he simply just has to go now, because if he's still Leader when the new Tory leader gets elected, they'll immediately call a general election and trounce an infighting, weak and unpopular Labour party, which would be a laugh, but it'd also be very bad for democracy, as governments with weak opposition do stupid things.
 
The PLP doesn't represent or have a mandate for anything.

Individual MPs do represent their constituencies and have a mandate to do that from their electorate. You would hope that the electorate would expect their MP to work diligently, especially when the sh*t hits the fan as it has these past few days and the country is in a very real crisis. The last thing I think most people would be wanting them to do what they have been doing.

As for your second point, the local Labour membership does technically select every Labour candidate in every constituency, though over the past couple of decades the centre has fixed selections and parachuted in various people who do not share similar experiences to those who they represent; hence the disconnect between the party and its MPs that is so obvious now.

Erm... what?

Exactly.

The PLP - consists of people - ELECTED to Westminster by members of the ELECTORATE.

What more a mandate can they have!?!??!? FFS :bye:

Jesus H Christ.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top