so why have Kick it out decided to comment on the brewster incident, but not the holgate incident? It seems that they're almost identical, but what really raises my eyebrows is their comment:
"Kick It Out believes there are issues with clubs, such as Spartak Moscow, who have been involved in several alleged racist incidents in recent years, receiving little or no discouragement by national and international football authorities in response to allegations of racism and discrimination."
Why are they singling out Spartak when the other club involved have just been involved in a racial allegation, as well as the Tom Adeyemi and Patrice Evra incidents also in the last few years. And then again the sick abuse evra receieved recently, despite being a victim. A Liverpool player was found guilty of racism and yet the club still hasn't moved on, supporting the racist in the process. I'm sorry, but liverpool are the club they should be using as an example of a club with issues.