Holgate may get punished on the tweets, Andre Grey got a 4 match ban for his.
15 years old he was when he tweeted them so I'd be surprised if he got punished for it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Holgate may get punished on the tweets, Andre Grey got a 4 match ban for his.
This attitude is exactly why we get f****d over all the time.Our manager and directors of our club should rise above this kind of thing, not insinuate anything and let the correct authorities deal with it. When the decision has been reached then comment, agree or appeal to it.
In doing so he was attempting to frame the nature and range of any inquiry: "bit of push and shove, bit of verbals...nothing to see here..."What point? He only said he thought the ref was consulting the 4th official over the push and found out later it was about something else.
You just know them lot will make a big deal out of it to distract from Firmino.15 years old he was when he tweeted them so I'd be surprised if he got punished for it.
This attitude is exactly why we get f****d over all the time.
15 years old he was when he tweeted them so I'd be surprised if he got punished for it.
The FA will act only reluctantly, and media disinterest is what pleases them with respect to that. Why help them bury this issue by stating nothing before their judgementHaha what attitude is that ? Waiting and seeing what happens, maybe getting all the facts first ? Before you burst in with all guns blazing, to what is a very sensitive issue.
Ah it really is the Jeremy Kyle age nowadays.
In doing so he was attempting to frame the nature and range of any inquiry: "bit of push and shove, bit of verbals...nothing to see here..."
Big Sam: "I've nowt to say lad. Walshy might".
Not good enough.
I thought Grey's were a few years old too, may be mistaken though
The FA will act only reluctantly, and media disinterest is what pleases them with respect to that. Why help them bury this issue by stating nothing before their judgement
Really? That doesn't sound like much of a bench if they wouldn't 100% believe at least two of their own players on the pitch at point blank range to the incident.Still disagree completely. I bet if you asked our bench, they would have said the same. In fact so would everyone watching on tv if they didnt show replays.
Klopp can have his moments but this isnt one.
Really? That doesn't sound like much of a bench if they wouldn't 100% believe at least two of their own players on the pitch at point blank range to the incident.
Team morale must be rubbish.
It's not a forensic court of law mate. It's a panel making a decision on an incident in a football match and if it looks 50/50 then they'll be delighted if there's no one going to bat publicly for the injured party.Anything they say before getting the facts leaves them open to all sorts. Bloody hell Davek.
After the final whistle went they'd have known...all of them including Allardyce.At what point did players rush over to the bench to tell them what had happened? If none of them did then how would they know?
They probably only found out at HT