He's a better keeper than at least 4 of the keepers from the 13 teams who finished below us last season, in one of the best leagues in the world. I think 'perfectly good' describes him pretty well. The teams above us all have better goal keepers but the teams above us with the exception of Newcastle spend a lot more money than we do.
Anybody thinking we can get a markedly better keeper right now (rather than blooding a young one) than Howard without spending money we don't have is wrong.
That's at least partly because we sell all our young keepers isn't it?
Howard has had one good game, four average games and one poor game this year. He's not on great form and he's been generally on the decline since 2010 when he was close to one of the best in the league. Criticism of him is fair.
Now it's equally fair to say he's still good enough for a 7th place team and that we can't afford any better but well the same things were being said about Saha and Beckford pre Jelavic.
The truth is he does look like one of the weakest links in our team. I'm fine with him being our keeper for now, but if money came in he'd be one of the first people I'd be looking to replace. Say we made the champions league, would you want him in goal against the likes of Messi and Ibrahimovic? Of course you wouldn't. He's a player who suits the level we are now as a club but not the level we hope to achieve.