I guess they could re-insert another 30% clause after they've re-sold him, so if he ends up going for more in the future, they'd get more? But I agree, seems like a waste of time. Unless there is something in it for the player (and agent) from being sold twice, can't see why the player would go for this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
Window is not over ffs i dont think the squad is ready, the club is still trying to bring players in we could bring in a cb 2 wingers cm and a cf. that is just with dcl onana leaving
Worked out OK with Johnson and beattie (as in we got the player we wanted)
Raino85
Player Valuation: £35m
If he signed a 4 year deal, that's £3m a year on PSR.
Sell him to us next summer, then they pocket the full £18m on the books of next years PSR
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
Trust me as Everton fans we’ve done all the mental gymnastics to try to make bad deals seem like good deals. But even if you get him at a discounted 14m the 9m to own a player you already owned is pure wastage. You can amortise that but it’s still 9m. And yes you may well make a profit if x and y occur but it’s still 9m less profit on a player you had for nothing.
You’re on top of the world right now and fair play to you but these things catch up, believe me.
But like you say, there’s all sorts of games here so let’s see what happens. I still suspect all parties are just milking Ipswich for a bit more.
kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
On your FM save yeah
We aren’t wanting to spend £16m on a player to be backup to Jack Harrison.
Tony’s Carp
Player Valuation: £50m
They don’t because you’d have to subtract his remaining book value. Plus the first year of amortisation is paid so really there’s little to no PSR benefit.
Even if they get him for the discounted 14 then sell him for the full 18 that’s no more profit than just letting someone else buy him and taking the sell on fee. In fact it’s worse because you have two lots of buying / selling fees. It’s not worth the hassle.
MACCA75
Player Valuation: £70m
Knowing that Harrison and McNeil will be first choice is extremely depressing.
They would be if we sign absolutely nobody, yes.
maybe so and I see your point. but we sold a player last summer to Burnley for £18m that had played 0 minutes for us; Archer to Sheff U for roughly the same who also had little prem exposure; Kellyman this season for 19m. I would be extremely confident that if we were to re-sign him and then sell him again next summer, or the one after, he would easily match if not outstrip those figures. We certainly wouldn't lose money on him. Unfortunately in today's PSR world - and you as a set of supporters will know more than most on this - transfers are no longer about just getting a player in but buying young and looking for resale value. Philogene would likely fall into the category. After we failed to get the losses raised to 130m our CEO said we'd have to find more imaginative ways around the rules, this appears to be the strategy.
TheBigIguana
Player Valuation: £100m
It would be awesome to have a winger who runs fast
pfim
Player Valuation: £40m
Harrison would play over him to start. He’d need to force his way in. 16 million is not that much, probably close to Harrison’s value if he were sold
The fee will also be ammortised mate, so even if they keep him for a season and sell him next year for 18 mill or even loan him out, they've done well.
Ming the Merciful
Player Valuation: £2.5m
How long ago were they?
The trend is for protracted or fought over players is that we lose out for the majority.
Unless we get a deal done immediately once other clubs enter the fray it's usually time to look elsewhere.
- Status