Not in football. Congrats, you have conceded 0 goals this season. But you scored 0. You are literally on the cusp of relegation.Defences and keepers win titles...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not in football. Congrats, you have conceded 0 goals this season. But you scored 0. You are literally on the cusp of relegation.Defences and keepers win titles...
Not in football. Congrats, you have conceded 0 goals this season. But you scored 0. You are literally on the cusp of relegation.
Because you can still win by scoring 50. If you never score you arent winning. FFS, Liverpool had this down to a science 2 years ago.Don’t really get this post. How is it different from saying;
Congrats. You scored 50 but conceded 85. You’ve been relegated! ?
Why would Tierney move here to be a utility man? Why would we pay $30M for someone to play them out of position?
If Robinson isn't a capable enough backup, I understand wanting to get another player in, but find a bargain with upside.
Not in football. Congrats, you have conceded 0 goals this season. But you scored 0. You are literally on the cusp of relegation.
Don’t really get this post. How is it different from saying;
Congrats. You scored 50 but conceded 85. You’ve been relegated! ?
Because you can still win by scoring 50. If you never score you arent winning. FFS, Liverpool had this down to a science 2 years ago.
I think the point is that there are teams who are flamboyant and can score copious amounts of goals (Liverpool last season), but the difference is their defence.Because you can still win by scoring 50. If you never score you arent winning. FFS, Liverpool had this down to a science 2 years ago.
I think the point is that there are teams who are flamboyant and can score copious amounts of goals (Liverpool last season), but the difference is their defence.
The team who wins the league have typically been the team who concede the least, or are only one or two off the best figure; most league will follow this trend.
Contracts of players potentially to be moved on.
2019
Baines
Williams
Jagielka
Browning
2020
Stekelenburg
Cuco
Garbutt
Galloway
McCarthy
Mirallas
Tarashaj
Niasse
2021
Pennington
Bolasie
Walcott
Besic
Schneiderlin
The bad news is that we still have 2.5 seasons) to rid ourselves of the final 5.
The 'good news' is that over that time period, either by contracts elapsing or sales we can clear off the wages of 17 players.
Edit as per @MarcelsGoat
STCC focuses on wages
FFP focuses on overall spending/debt
*so we should benefit on STCC rules season on season.
It’s getting worse too. Every thread is full of utter guff saying the same garbage over and over.We are playing a left winger up top, if Gomes goes back to Barca we are back to playing Tom Davies in midfield, but no, what we DEFO need is another Left Back.
Zat ladies and gents, the man you wouldnt allow to even touch your FM save.
I think the point is that there are teams who are flamboyant and can score copious amounts of goals (Liverpool last season), but the difference is their defence.
The team who wins the league is typically the team who concede the least, or are only one or two off the best figure; most league will follow this trend I presume.
For me games are won and lost in midfield, not all the time and not every team, some teams are built on strong defences, Jose has won titles that way, some teams are built on strong attacks, wow, my memory is bad, but I cant instantly think of a team that was built solely to attack and was successful, but anyway, then theres other teams, like the Leicester team, that was built on pure workrate, teamwork and a desire to win.
For me Citys strongest area is midfield, David Silva and the boy KDB are just peerless, they have of course AGUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERO up top and Scrappy Doo on the wing, but I wouldnt say any of their defenders are top class, the Keeper is very good of course.
Last season City won the title, they conceded the least goals, they scored the most goals.
The season before Spurs conceded the least and scored the most to finish 2nd.
The season before Utd finished 5th while conceding the least, City 4th scoring the most.
Chelsea won the title, conceding the least, City finished 2nd scoring the most.
Anyway, I was just interested, of course a good defence and a good keeper helps, as does a good striker, but for me games are won and lost in midfield.
Just noFellaini walks on this team in front of Walcott or Bernard. Siggy would move out wide.
Zivkovic would fit the model of recruitment exactly that Brands has used since arriving, 22 years old, has taken the step up with his move to Portugal and excelled, and ready for that next step to a major top league,, would fit the system, and regarded as a player with untapped potential.
In the past we have recruited a step below what we are currently doing, as has brands at previous clubs due to his finances, nice to see what he's doing is effectively keeping the same strategy he's previously had, but adjusting it to suit the club and financial strength he now has. It actually removes a level of risk that previously both us and him have taken, now we are targeting players a step later/earlier in their career than we had to previously.
Having a back up for our defenders is essential, but i don’t like the fluidity amongst positions that Zat is suggesting. For me a first choice back four, each with an assigned position and an able deputy is the way to go - the best teams have stability at the back.
Pickford (Virginia)
Wan-Bissaka (Coleman / Kenny)
Mina (Keane)
Zouma (Holgate)
Digne (Baines / Robinson)
Two signings, Zouma and Wan-Bissaka and we have a very strong back line with good back ups for each position