It's an interesting thought but it's not going to happen for the following reasons:
(i) the increase in broadcasting revenues widens the disparity in payments made to clubs, for example the gap between 1st and 10th in order of broadcasting revenue grows from £22 million last year to £35 million next year.
(ii) the wealthier clubs already have the infrastructure, stadia and long term commercial deals which clubs like Everton are frankly unlikely ever to enjoy (without the biggest of all sugar daddies buying our club)
(iii) FFP will not allow the clubs with smaller revenues to compete on salaries (let alone transfer fees)
If it was a rising tide that floated all boats equally then it's plausible, but this tide floats the wealthier clubs higher than the less wealthy.
I don't think point 1 applies to my concept, really. This is because of an assumption (which could be very incorrect I admit) that there will be an eventual 'natural cap' in which clubs won't go beyond for transfers due to value for money. I.E. Buy Stones for £150 million, or buy Mori for £5 million...I think even Abramovich will flinch at some point and just stop trying to buy the best players from within the Prem - he'll go outside of it for a facsimile...again I could be wrong.
Point 2 is EXTREMELY valid and something that we need to address, however due to the limitations stated by FFP, if the Sky money continues to grow - Sky becomes our sugar daddy that can clear our debts and allow us to build infrastructure/spend on marketing and commercial dealings.
Point 3 is linked to Point 2. FFP will not allows us to compete on salaries and transfer funds - but the Sky money will prevent us from needing to sell. The salary issue only comes in when a player nears the end of their contract or we're in a bidding war with the wealthy elite. Ideally, that Sky money will be reinvested in infrastructure and marketing to establish other revenue streams that allow us to compete more completely.
As I stated, it's very much a
could. And it should not be what we bank on, we should be working all day and night on getting investment NOW, but it does seem to be a scenario that could play out. Assuming City, Chelsea, and United eventually hit a level of spending that even they're uncomfortable with.
The key isn't who has the most money in this scenario - it's that everyone has so much money that they no longer need to sell their best players.